911 -- Collapse My Arse

from http://ningens-blog.blogspot.com/

North Tower Obliteration

The top is already gone - what is pressing down on this massive building?

South Tower Annihilation

Stop calling this a "collapse"

Blown to Kingdom Come

Smoke pours up; the building peels to the sides all the way down to the ground. (Thanks to Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds for "Blown to Kingdom Come" and "peels")

South Tower Disintegration

If the top part is what is pile-driving the bottom part, why is it shorter than the top of the North Tower next to it? If gravity is all that is doing this, doesn't all that dust mean that the lower part is resisting the upper part? How is the top part losing mass at the same time it is driving the lower part downward in "free-fall"? And why didn't the top part fall off to the side? (Part of this may be perspective, but other pictures show the top part losing mass early on).

Do you trust your own judgment? Does this make sense?

"As the heat of the fire intensified, the joints on the most severely burned floors gave way, causing the perimeter wall columns to bow outward and the floors above them to fall. The buildings collapsed within ten seconds, hitting bottom with an estimated speed of 200 km/h" MIT Professor Thomas Eager

Firefighters reach 78th floor of South Tower

• "Ladder 15, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines."

Fire Engineering Editor - investigation was "half-baked farce"

• Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the "official investigation" blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure.

Strong Building

Those massive core columns could support the building's weight several times over. The external columns could also bear 40% of the building's weight with no wind, and also could withstand steady wind loads of 30 times the weight of a Boeing 767.

"Flight 175"

Real planes don't do this.

The Ghost Plane

• "To the casual observer, it would appear that the facade of the Twin Towers did not offer any resistance at all . . . How was it possible that the relatively weak, light, and airy airframe damaged the apparently heavy lattice of high strength steel columns?" MIT impact engineering expert Tomas Wierzbicki

Gerard Holmgren: Manufactured Terrorism - The Truth About 9/11

• This article presents a summary of the evidence that the entire event was planned and carried out by the US govt and its agencies with the full complicity of major media organizations.

Government scientists' "Foot of God" hypothesis

• What we are looking at, in essence, is increasing weight UN-loading, not loading . . . as the tops blew right off these buildings from the top down, there was quite literally NOTHING BUT ATMOSPHERE, above the entire length of remaining UNDAMAGED structure, containing a 47 steel column core . . . are we to believe that this nothingness--the "Foot of God"?--then exerted such massive downward force and momentum . . .

Jeff King explains the explosions of the Twin Towers

• Jeff King is a physician who studied engineering at MIT, and gives an excellent 15-minute video presentation

==============

If only I had not read your paper, I would not have seen the doublethink in David Ray Griffin's presentation.

http://members.iinet.net.au/%7Eholmgren/slithering.html

Bathed in his erudite eloquence, I could have been at one with the Movement, knowing that an argument blessed by the keeper of all things truthly could not contradict any other argument so blessed, so we could march on together toward the Truth. I could have stood and cheered with everyone else. Instead, I sat, appalled as Griffin talked about the empirical method yet went back and forth between a plane at the Pentagon and no plane at the Pentagon, stand-down one minute, faked phone calls the next, while also questioning whether planes were hijacked at all.

The low point of the evening was when Griffin got the audience to laugh at the government's story about Flight 93 disappearing into soft soil in Pennsylvania, then proceeded to assume without question that planes disappeared into hard buildings in New York.

There were other examples of doublethink, and not just related to the planes issue. Thanks to you, I will have to write more about them later.

And now you've done it to Morgan Reynolds, and are threatening to do it to Judy Wood.

http://members.iinet.net.au/%7Eholmgren/liars.html


How could you?

Thank you.

======================