Scott Stevens - Dr Judy Wood - Andrew Johnson - WSHC - Doug Herrick
CRAZY paranoiac Scott Stevens
Download the AUDIO (20mB mp3 podcast) of the phantasists rambling on and on on
Scott Stevens - Dr Judy Wood - Andrew Johnson - WSHC - Doug Herrick - 31 Oct 2008.mp3 (20.8 MB)
1 November 2008 John Hutchison is the guest of William Alek , with Judy Wood on "The PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGY HOUR" (>>>>mp3<<<<<<)(15.1 MB)
Zero Point Energy, Scientists getting suicided, Carrs that run on water, THE RUSSIANS of course. Tom Bearden Tesla Haarp Scalar.
and get this: Petroleum is constantly produced by the earth.
About Me
 |
Hi, I'm Scott Stevens. Weather has been a fascination of mine since I started keeping a weather diary for a Scouting merit badge, that was back in July 1978. For that badge I had to watch the local stations weathercast, log the forecast, and keep the daily weather conditions in a diary for 30 days. By months end I was hooked on the weather; and I was just 12 years of age. Two years after earning the weather merit badge came my Eagle award. By the summer of my 13th year I was reporting our small town's daily conditions to the area TV stations. Little did I know, but hoped, that those contacts would become my way into the TV business. By my senior year in high school I was working at KIFI TV, the NBC affiliate at the time, in Idaho Falls as a studio camera operator/production assistant. Soon I was also a photographer for the news department, as time and my other responsibilities allowed. During that year I figured out that I wanted to be doing weather for a career even though my first weather casting takes really stunk! They were so bad that I thought I'd end up in business school. Thankfully, I am a lot better now!
I chose the University of Kansas to study meteorology. These Idaho winters were just too rugged for me. Snow in May, yuck! There was that and the math requirements at KU weren't too tough.
During my sophomore year at KU I auditioned for one of three weather openings at KTKA in Topeka. I was not yet good enough. I was just 20, still a little young and scared. Five months later I received a call back, this time I landed a job that would cost me twice as much to keep as it paid. I had to buy a car. Ah, the glory of TV! But 13 months later I had gone from a 2-hour/5 day a week job to the main guy. It felt good. Not long afterwards a phone call came from Omaha Nebraska, and RFD-TV. It was a start-up satellite news service that delivered agricultural focused news and weather information to a national audience. It was a very tough job in many aspects and a great learning experience.
Storm chasing, at KJRH in Tulsa Oklahoma, came during the early 90's where I worked the morning show. I enjoyed that job just about the most of all. The weather there was the easiest to forecast and I didn't even mind,too much, the 3:30am alarm.
I spent a little more than a year in the Capital District of New York as the chief for WRGB. What beautiful country! And they know how to clear the roads after a big snowstorm!
I returned home in 1996 to eastern Idaho to work for KPVI-TV staying nearly 10 years. In September 2005 I began to pursue this interest full time. Without question, forecasting here has been a great challenge; I suppose even more so with all that is going on in the skies.
This is my first attempt at a web site. I just wanted to get the 'bones' of this thing up and going so I can learn Dreamweaver and watch this project and the global awareness of all that is occuring in the skies grow.
Send me your pictures and thoughts. I am especially interested to hear from others employed in the weather industry.
Thanks for stopping by and reading.
Scott Stevens
This image was taken the morning of November 17, 2004 from a plane departing New York's JFK airport.
A flood of negative ions deposited into this hole acts on the clouds by releasing static bonds that are holding the clouds together. The hydrogen and oxygen bonds holding the the water molecules together are broken and with the resulting release moisture falls/crystallizes/sublimates out of the cloud above. Several examples follow below.
This image caused quite a stir in late summer 2003 when this image was captured some place in Alabama, if I recall correctly. I enjoyed reading the accounts of how the meteorological community struggled to explain how this cloud formed from their limited knowledge of the electrical processes at work in our atmosphere. The accepted explanation was that there was a condensation nuclei present that initiated the event. Still no answer as to why the circular shape and source of the nuclei to trigger its formation. You now know that it was a flood of negative ions delivered by HAARP or similar technologies to rain out the cloud cover into this weeping cirrus cloud.
Another negative ion energy weapon strike within a gridded altocumulus field.
Battle Creek Michigan 21 September 2004 Nearing sunset. Wow! What a strike! A burst of energy with the rippling action rolling outward toward the thick chemtrail off the the right/eastern edge of the frame. Click on the picture for the full, very large, raw image. I am of the firm belief that there are several reasons these chem and contrails are laid out across our skies. Aerosols for the scattering of the solar insolation, sun shielding/ozone repair, over the horizon radar and communications, tracing lines via a contrail grid to determine shear zones generated by the scalar weapons and finally something like an energy barrier standing as an alert system of some sort. Note the airborne-non airplane-object in the upper left. Could chemtrails be acting as a scalar charged barrier that when one of these object penetrates the chemcloud barrier some kind of alert is then triggered? The more open the mind the more likely we are to consider all possible evidences and truths.
This was taken about two minutes later. After this much HAARP activity it is about time for a fresh layer of the chemtrail mixture. There is a war in the skies, and it is about time we are told with whom and why! NASA must declassify all spacecraft watching the Sun so we can know the truth.
Helical twisting off near the horizon with an indent in the foreground.
The big Tesla howitzers are aimed at their targets by using a worldwide electromagnetic pattern called the "Woodpecker Grid," begun by the Russians in 1976.
You can hear the Woodpecker signal here: http://www.cheniere.org/misc/woodpeckersound.htm
The woodpecker grid is just that, a grid of EM waves which provide a channel for the LW waves to any point on earth. Computers use the woodpecker grid information to hone down the aiming of the howitzers to a pinpoint location on earth. (For that matter, it could be under the earth, in space, or under the sea).
A third howitzer mode is what Col. Bearden calls "Mindsnapper" mode. This is a truly frightening mode which affects the electromagnetic mind-body connection. (The electrical connection of the soul's EM DNA to the body's physical DNA pattern) Being mind-snapped at a low level would cause you to lose consciousness. Being mind-snapped at a slightly higher power would "entrain" all minds in the target area into a kind of hypnogogic trance, a state in which they would all be highly susceptible to suggestions and orders.
Being mind-snapped at high level would so disrupt the mind-body connection that everyone in the target area would fall down, instantly dead. Not only that, everything around you and inside you would be killed, so that your sterilized body would not rot for quite a long time.
The Mindsnapper can be used for a small area, or to kill an entire population. In fact, using the scalar waves to affect the human mind has become a new field in its own right, and has been dubbed "psychoenergetics." (This is discussed below in section 5).
Bearden describes the use of the howitzer in mind-snapping mode against people, to cause unconsciousness or death:
"From a military viewpoint, these scalar EM weapons are really quite all-around weapons.
"For example, they are very lethal against personnel.
"Set in the "high intensity pulse mode," one blast and a person's nervous system is destroyed instantly. Total, instantaneous death results. One can blast away at entire groups of infantrymen, for example. It's the peak power that's important, not the average power. So the weapon doesn't require too much battery power.
"Set on a lower intensity pulse mode, one zap can simply knock out a person, rendering him instantly unconscious. Quite useful if one needs prisoners to interrogate. Also very silent, which is useful in operations employing stealth and surprise." Bearden http://www.cheniere.org/books/ferdelance/s80.htm
"Those hit by the scalar EM weapon, however, have a most peculiar death mode.
"Death comes-instantly and totally. There is no convulsion, no response. The entire nervous system is destroyed instantly. Every living cell in the body is killed instantly, including all bacteria, germs, etc.
"A body hit with this thing falls like a limp rag and lies where it falls. It doesn't decay in even 30-45 days. In a macabre fashion, it's been reduced to something like food irradiated with nuclear radiation; everything is killed, so the material is preserved for an extended period before any decay can set in."
Bearden http://www.cheniere.org/books/ferdelance/s81.htm
He goes on to say that the same "bazooka-sized scalar EM pulse weapon" can also be used to knock out a tank with one shot (or pulse). So tank warfare is obsolete. Helicopters? Bearden points out: "... if he's attacked by a helicopter or a fixed-wing aircraft, he can bring the same weapon to bear on it. He can knock down a chopper or a jet. With one shot."
In The Electric Sky How to Make, or Suppress Rainfall.
The following is an excerpt from http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/resource/apr04/0404nele.html in which Russian atmospheric scientists are selling and installing atmospheric ionizers in northern Mexico to relieve their parched farmlands.
The article above but with an informational critique inserted which in my opinion balances and adds needed depth and a more complete understanding to the story. http://www.holoscience.com/news.php?article=9eq6g3aj
...But some atmospheric scientists aren't so sure the Russians aren't selling snake oil. "[Ionization] is highly unconventional and in my realm of experience, I have seen no concrete evidence published in a refereed journal, nor have I seen sufficient credible eyewitness verification that the technology works as touted," says George Bomar, the meteorologist charged by the Texas government with licensing the state's weather modification projects.
Comment: This is the common phenomenon of cognitive dissonance in science. The Russians are performing a weather experiment which should fail according to accepted theory. So the scientist complains that he has seen no concrete evidence published in a refereed journal. But the complaint reduces to a matter of belief. Scientists do not believe electrical power is input to weather systems. Referees who believe atmospheric electricity is an effect, rather than a cause of weather, would almost certainly find grounds for rejecting funding for, or publication of, such an experiment. The same applies to the publication of reports from credible eyewitnesses. For decades airline pilots witnessed strange lightning above storms but were discouraged from reporting it. The objection is unfair and unscientific. Advances come from challenging established beliefs.
Ionization technology is called either IOLA (ionization of the local atmosphere) by Earthwise or ELAT (electrification of the atmosphere) by the company ELAT. IOLA and ELAT compete with conventional cloud seeding, which though it also remains scientifically unproven, is used in more than 24 countries and 10 U.S. states. Cloud seeding usually involves dispersing a chemical agent such as silver iodide into cloud formations, which helps ice crystals form, leading, it is thought, to bigger clouds and more precipitation than without seeding. The ionization approach, according to Bissiachi, now ELAT's vice president of R&D and operations, does a similar job but twice over. Ions attract water in the atmosphere, creating the aerosol that produces clouds, and they also charge the dust already in the air, making particles become more attractive nuclei for water droplets, which coalesce and fall to the ground as rain.
Comment: It seems that the basic problem in gaining acceptance for ionization technology is the facile description of what causes rain. And that is a problem inherited from the experts the meteorologists and atmospheric scientists. The water molecule is fascinating because, unlike the nitrogen and oxygen molecules in the air, it is electrically polarized.
The oxygen (blue) side of the water molecule is more negative than the hydrogen side (red), forming an electric dipole.
In an electric field, the water molecule will rotate to line up with the field. When it condenses in a cloud the average electric dipole moment of a water molecule in a raindrop is 40 percent greater than that of a single water vapor molecule. This enhancement results from the large polarization caused by the electric field induced by surrounding water molecules. In the atmospheric electric field the water molecules will be aligned with their dipoles pointing vertically and in a sense that is determined by the charge polarization in the cloud. It is interesting to note that the tops of storm clouds are positively charged and the base is negative. That is the reverse of the radial charge polarization within the Earth itself. And it is this charge polarization that gives rise to the low-order attractive force we call gravity. So it is proposed that water droplets in clouds experience an antigravity effect. It appears to be related to the Biefield-Brown Effect, where a charged high-voltage planar capacitor tends to move in the direction of the positive electrode. That effect may explain how millions of tons of water can be suspended kilometers above the ground, when cloud droplets are about 1,000 times denser than the surrounding air.
Of course, this raises the issue of charge separation in clouds. The conventional isolated Earth view is that positive and negative charge is somehow separated by vertical winds in clouds and that this process in thunderstorms is responsible for charging up the ionosphere and causing the atmospheric electric field. But this begs the question of cause and effect. Recent high-altitude balloon flights find that charge is not built up in the cloud, it already exists in the ionosphere above. In January 2002 I argued the electric universe model: Thunderstorms are not electricity generators, they are passive elements in an interplanetary circuit, like a self-repairing leaky condenser. The energy stored in the cloud "condenser" is released as lightning when it short-circuits. The short-circuits can occur either within the cloud or across the external resistive paths to Earth or the ionosphere. The charge across the cloud "condenser" gives rise to violent vertical electrical winds within the cloud, not vice versa.
This view accords with a recent report (17 November 2003) in Geophysical Review Letters by Joseph Dwyer of the Florida Institute of Technology, which says that according to conventional theory electrical fields in the atmosphere simply cannot grow large enough to trigger lightning. The conventional view of how lightning is produced is wrong. And so the true origin of lightning remains a mystery.
Water vapor in rising air cools and condenses to forms clouds. The conventional explanation for rising air relies upon solar heating. The electrical weather model has an additional galactic energy source (the same that powers the Sun) to drive the movement of air. It is the same energy source that drives ferocious high-level winds on the giant outer planets, where solar energy is extremely weak. Once the water vapor condenses into water droplets it is more plausible that millions of tons of water can remain suspended kilometers above the earth by electrical means, rather than by thermal updraughts. The clouds would act to reduce thermals...
Please take the time to read the entire enlightening article.
THIS P D F FILE SHOWS THE SEISMOGRAMS THAT PROVE THE EARTH QUAKES WHERE MAN MADE.
With the seismographic data from several sites the location the earth quakes originate from is calculatable by a computer.
Ionospheric heaters where used according to the article but I think scalar interferometers could do the same (see list of 14 countries with these so called quantum potential weapons which produce longitudinal waves which pass through all materials known to man unlike Hertzian waves.
(brought to you by the Star Wars Program)
Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect
Download the AUDIO (20mB mp3 podcast) of the phantasists rambling on and on
1. New waves discovered
Longitudinal EM energy fills vacuum of space, the time domain of spacetime, time as compressed energy, E=tc2, waves of time, phase conjugate wave pairs."Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can drive the world's machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common fuels." Nikola Tesla
"At any point and at any time, one can freely and inexpensively extract enormous EM energy flows directly from the active vacuum itself." Tom Bearden
I guess the first thing to try to comprehend is that a "new" kind of electromagnetic (EM) wave has been discovered in the empty vacuum of space which, when engineered, can be an inexhaustible supply of energy in great magnitude at any place in the universe. The word "new" is in quotes because the discovery really goes back to Nikola Tesla and his discovery of what he called "radiant energy." It is also not "new" because the Russians (KGB) have been working on this technology for over 30 years and have weaponized these "new" longitudinal scalar waves to a great degree.
These are the weapons Nikita Khrushchev spoke of in January, 1960.
"By 1957-8 the Soviets had progressed to the point of a giant scalar EM accident in the Urals which exploded nearby atomic wastes, devastating the area. They had also progressed to development of great new superweapons using their new energetics - weapons to which Khrushchev referred in 1960 when he informed the Soviet Presidium of a new, fantastic weapon in development, a weapon so powerful that it could wipe out all life on earth if unrestrainedly employed.'" Tom Bearden
After over 30 years of development, and extensive testing around the globe, these new scalar electromagnetic weapons are up and running and ready to go. Tom Bearden, at his website Cheniere, dicusses the history of these new scalar electromagnetic weapons in his paper "Historical Background of Scalar EM Weapons."
Download the AUDIO (20mB mp3 podcast) of the phantasists rambling on and on
Earth's magnetic field:
)){kind=link}
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home