fear of the then boogieman du jour GLADIO PAK
by Zahir Ebrahim
Let me begin this very difficult exposition as a Pakistani citizen (my only citizenship despite being a legal permanent resident in the United States for almost three decades) with the question: Who really killed Benazir Bhutto?
I mean the prime-movers. The trigger-pullers are obviously irrelevant and remain faceless. They will surely never be known.
Well, let's read it in Benazir Bhutto's own lucid words which have now been augmented, almost two years later, with the Pakistan's Army Chief of Staff's belated disclosures of September 21, 2009. Why belated? Well, please see these unpublished letters to many Pakistani newspaper editors on their repeatedly perpetuating the fiction of Who Killed Benazir Bhutto in cahoots with the 'hectoring hegemons' and their agents! All traitors and co-opted errand boys
The American agenda for Pakistan is not a state-secret. Rather, it is only thinly disguised as perpetually fighting the .insurgents. in a lifetime of war, the World War IV. Whereas, in reality, both the .insurgency., and the .counter-insurgency., are entirely designed and fabricated in the USA as part of the evolving tactics of Hegelian Dialectics. They are enacted on the ground by various two-bit errand boys and expert trigger pullers.
The already well-known existence of black-ops assassination squads in Pakistan/Afghanistan, known to the local peoples for years as the real prime-movers behind the heinous local terrorist acts, belatedly confirmed by NYT, WP, and NYT, in August 2009. See these two December 2008 reports on the Mumbai terrorist Act as reportedly orchestrated by Ali Baba from his perch in the Hindu Kush. The arrival of the black-ops in the region is not recent, albeit the public disclosures might be.
Starting in the immediate aftermath of 911, and perhaps even earlier, Pakistan may well have become the largest deployment region for the CIA in modern times, both covert (unknown to Pakistani government and secretly working to destabilize Pakistan with false-flag operations), and overt (with Pakistani military's aiding and abetting, in full view of the world, ostensibly fighting the .insurgents., .Bin Laden., .Al-Qaaeda., but in the process mainly .tickling. its own innocent civilians in many a barbaric way).
And since Jundallah got launched to destabilize Iran, Baluchistan along with the Pak-Afghan regions have been awash with black-ops, and obviously of course, also with officially recognized US soldiers manning American military bases on Pakistani soil. But these soldiers of freedom were rarely spotted in the streets of major cities before. The following video report of September 08, 2009, therefore portends of ominous whirlwinds imminently engulfing Pakistan:
RussiaToday September 08, 2009, Contractors in Pakistan: are troops next?
The multimodal approaches to destabilizing, and consequently balkanizing Pakistan are so transparent that today, many a retired con-fession artist are getting in on the act to claim the flag of patriotism. Going for hajj after having eaten 900 mice is the favorite pastime of Pakistani praetorian guards. I am only waiting for any sitting Pakistani General to rise to that occasion, if it's not already too late! But I am afraid it probably is . see here, here, here, and here. The decapitation of Pakistan by Pakistan's finest, wantonly justifying the inglorious 'white man's burden' . the same old 'la mission civilisatrice' under a new name . upon impoverished indigenous shoulders! Even Martin Luther Kings' penetrating description fails to do justice to the scale of calamity in Pakistan:
.The white establishment is skilled in flattering and cultivating emerging leaders. It presses its own image on them and finally, from imitation of manners, dress, and style of living, a deeper strain of corruption develops. This kind of Negro leader acquires the white man's contempt for the ordinary Negro. He is often more at home with the middle-class white than he is among his own people. His language changes, his location changes, his income changes, and ultimately he changes from the representative of the Negro to the white man into the white man's representative to the Negro..
The shameful and criminal dislocation of up to 2.4 million civilians in May of this year was rightly described as .an exodus that is beyond biblical..
In Pakistan, an exodus that is beyond biblical
Just as from the USSR's point of view in yesteryear, the .insurgency. against them in Afghanistan was foreign inculcated, entirely fabricated in the USA (as we know today but held as a closely guarded secret then), which thus forced the Soviets to apply counter-insurgency measures, and subsequently, an outright invasion of Afghanistan (read Brzezinski's own statements in Saving Pakistan, and watch Brzezinski speak in this video clip devilishly crafting the .insurgency. for the Russians on the Pak-Afghan border); the so called .insurgency. in Pakistan is also calculatingly fabricated, ab initio, in the USA through covert intervention and black-ops. Subsequently, with sufficient .tickling. during the overt counter-insurgency operations, and by astutely harvesting all the cultural cracks and lacunae of the people, the .insurgency. acquires a reactionary life of its own.
That latter stage, as well as on-going black-ops induced wanton acts of terrorism using the pre-.tickled. dupes and patsies as now rapidly transpiring, October 9-12, 2009, NYT, NYT . like the secret and 'officially denied' component of NATO's Operation Gladio in Western Europe of yesteryear which blamed it on the communists to keep an increasingly skeptical public's fear of the then boogieman du jour continually alive . are Machiavellianly projected in the news media, by the native informants, by the fabricated dissent-chiefs, and the Mighty Wurlitzer, as INSURGENCY. And therefore, it is officially argued, an unarguable raison d'être for continuing the barbaric counter-insurgency to implement the writ of the state. This predictably creates a self-sustaining destabilization as both commonsense and political science 101 would inform even an imbecile. The blood-drenched puppetshow so enacted, inevitably affords a compelling pretext to the puppetmasters to justify their own military intervention to .save. the people who are incapable of doing it themselves.
The innocent Pakistan military, not too well-versed in political science or Hegelian Dialectics based Machiavellian state-craft (I presume), in this prelude to NATO forces marching in, is similarly being compelled to take real counter-insurgency measures like the Soviets. Aided and abetted of course by high ranking traitors from within their own ranks, and by their foreign paymasters' militaries (NATO, Blackwater now renamed Xe, and other un-named foreign divisions operating within Pakistan which I call .Jundallah-plusplus. to distinguish them from .Jundallah. which is apparently targeting Iran from Pakistani soil). The simple fact that Pakistan is supplying all the drinking water (bottled by Nestle), and full logistics channel for war-making supplies to NATO in Afghanistan is telling in and of itself. Pakistan is equally responsible for destroying the Afghan society, the Afghan people, and there is no less spilled-blood of innocent Afghani Muslims upon Pakistan's hands over the past 30 years, than upon the United States'.
Pakistani military helped destroy Afghanistan, and they are now helping to destroy Pakistan. No Pakistani civilian I know, including myself, ever authorized the Pakistani military to destroy Afghanistan, or aid the United States in its own hegemonic plans on the Grand Chessboard. Do you know anyone? So from where did they get their mandate? I would rather have clean drinking water in my tap, damn it! What good are the bloody nukes when they become the raison d'être for our very destruction in this manner without ever firing a single missile at the drones that are killing our own peoples?
It gives me no pleasure to repeatedly rehearse this footnote to history. What is not already obvious to the Pakistanis? It must surely still occur to many a reasonable military man serving with genuine zeal and honor in the real pivot of power in Pakistan that the end is drawing near. What are they doing idly watching the battle of their lives from the sidelines . when they are not shooting or displacing their own peoples that is? As quoted from a Dawn newspaper column, .THIS article poses two questions: on the day after US/Nato forces invade and occupy some of Balochistan and Waziristan, what will we say we should have done, and why aren.t we doing it now? Is this far-fetched? ... One hopes that a small group of patriotic officers in Pakistan are also asking themselves what can be done, and why aren.t we doing it now..
Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace--but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! And that's the tortuous déjà vu reality today.
If one is genuinely confused about who is the enemy, whether it's the Taliban, Al-Qaeeda, Islamism, Militant Islam, unknown foreign fighters, foreign intelligence agencies, India, Israel, American interests, or the United States' globalist oligarchs hell bent on criminally realizing their one-world government agenda by fabricating and harvesting revolutionary times across the planet, please spend the next couple of hours studying the following documents. They are available at http://humanbeingsfirst.org. Write to me if you are still uncertain about who is behind .tickling. the so called .insurgents. into existence, and why that is necessary in order to fight the lifetime of World War IV with our blood:
Please study the methods of Rand Corporation, CFR, Zbigniew Brzezinski, et. al., and acquire an understanding of the notion of world-government. Political science runs the world, and the children of Machiavelli are deeply rooted in waging war by way of deception . a game of conquest .as old as mankind..
From the East India Company to Free Trade to the War on Terror . all enablers of pretexts for .imperial mobilization. and .full spectrum dominance..
In the West, typically, the smartest students study humanities and social sciences, and the think-tanks as well as the Pentagon are populated with scores of PhDs in political science and history. What do you think they do there? What do you think they do at the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, and the Carnegie Endowment for Peace? How about at CFR and RIIA?
They are united in one common global agenda . world government. And they get there by shrewdly employing the overarching political science concept articulated by David Ben Gurion .what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times.!
The grand chessboard
APROPOS of your incredibly courageous reporting of Dr Mubashar Hasan.s views in your article, .US preparing to invade Pakistan. (Nov 22), I have to sadly say, .Precisely!.
This seems to be the first time that someone from within Pakistan has seen glimpses of the neo-con plan on the .grand chessboard. for Pakistan . at least publicly . one that was already publicly made known in 1996 by Zbigniew Brzezinski, the principal architect of .CIA intervention in Afghanistan. in 1979 and the subsequent Soviet invasion, both entirely deliberately and causally crafted, by Brzezinski.s own admission two decades later in 1999, by the Jimmy Carter administration of which he was the erstwhile National Security Adviser.
As of late, I have seen at least six redrawn maps of Pakistan. The .arc of crises., defined, since the Berlin Wall fell, to redraw these borders in precisely the same interests as Mubashar Hasan notes as reported in your article: .... It wanted an elected government of millionaires under civil and military establishment to serve its interests and those of millionaires in Pakistan...., except it is not only true for Pakistan but in the entire .arc of crises..
All of it is together serving the ruling interests of a handful of very elite billionaire ruling class worldwide in the natural culmination of this pyramid path into a one world government by the world.s ruling elite on the top. We already see the world.s financial control in their hands . and these already transcend national boundaries . money can already come and go across geographies in the fleeting of a butterfly.s wings, and most of the developmental economics and national policies of nations in the entire global South are already entirely beholden to western arm-twisting institutions like the WB and the IMF and their sister organisations.
We are merely seeing the baby-steps being played out today as well as in the near foreseeable future, and Pakistan is the heart of the matter in all these baby-steps . the only nuclear armed state that can change the tables overnight on the grand chessboard were it to acquire a truly independent government working in the interests of its own people. This will never be allowed to happen willingly in any nation, least of all in Pakistan, as should be obvious to anyone with half a brain.
If there was a statesman like Zulfikar Ali Bhutto alive today and in any position of national leadership, we may have seen interesting alliances and mutual defence pact treaties with our neighbours coming into existence. ZAB was, after all, whatever one might think of him . as a tyrant or saviour . the first person since the invention of modern nation-states to bring together all the Islamic countries in Lahore in an amazing summit in 1974 which is what actually sealed his fate.
The pursuit of the .Islamic bomb. was merely the icing on the cake as promised by Henry Kissinger . ZAB would have been removed as all globally nationalist leaders who have thought of .independence from hegemony. have always been removed, lest the trend becomes contagious and a global example for emulation by the have-nots!
So felicitations to Dr Mubashar Hasan on his courage to speak loudly what should be entirely obvious to all unco-opted peoples on this planet. The real issue is . and we already know the ailment whether or not some have the courage to express it . what is the remedy and who will beard the hungry lion, the self-described .hectoring hegemons. on the .grand chessboard.?