Pentagon Plane did NOT IMPACT

from Post Chronicle

http://www.postchronicle.com/news/original/article_21287595.shtml

Michael Moore: '9/11 Was An Inside Job,' Speaks At 'Sicko' Premiere

By Jack Ryan - Jun 20, 2007

Michael Moore has revealed that he thinks that 9/11 was an inside job. At
Michael Moore's 'Sicko' film premiere, he let his opinion be known about
what he thought of 9/11, and he thinks the tragedy was an inside job.

During Michael Moore's film premiere, two young men approached him for an
interview and asked him to comment on the 9/11 tragedy.

When Moore was asked what he thought about 9/11, he claimed that there's
much more to story and to the investigation than we know about. He says
the government "hasn't even told half of the truth", and he intends to
find out the whole truth.

Moore claimed that he has worked at the Pentagon for filming before, and
he said there are "hundreds of video cameras at the Pentagon", hidden all
over the place, including hidden in trees.

Moore wants to know what happened to the video of the plane crashing into
the five-story building. He said: "Why don't they want us to see the plane
crash into the building?" Basically, he wants to know what it is that he
claims the government "doesn't want us to see".

Moore wants everyone to demand that the tape of the plane crash be
released.

One of Moore's final words was this: "I intend to find some answers."

View the interview here:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8399599446820879166&hl=en

================================================

================================

http://dailyscare.com/1579/new-study-from-pilots-for-9-11-truth-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon

New study from Pilots for 9/11 Truth: No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon

Pilots for 9/11 Truth obtained black box data from the government under
the Freedom of Information Act for AA Flight 77, which The 9/11 Report
claims hit the Pentagon. Analysis of the data contradicts the official
account in direction, approach, and altitude. The plane was too high to
hit lamp posts and would have flown over the Pentagon, not impacted with
its ground floor. This result confirms and strengthens the previous
findings of Scholars for 9/11 Truth that no Boeing 757 hit the buillding.

Madison, WI (PRWEB) June 21, 2007 - A study of the black box data provided
by the government to Pilots for 9/11 Truth has confirmed the previous
findings of Scholars for 9/11 Truth that no Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon on
9/11. "We have had four lines of proof that no Boeing 757 hit the
building," said James Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth. "This
new study by Pilots drives another nail into a coffin of lies told the
American people by The 9/11 Commission":

The new society, an international organization of pilots and aviation
professionals, petitioned the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
under the Freedom of Information Act and obtained its 2002 report on
American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757 that, according to the official
account, hit the ground floor of the Pentagon after it skimmed over the
lawn at 500 mph plus, taking out a series of lamp posts in the process.
The pilots not only obtained the flight data but created a computer
animation to demonstrate what it told them.
This new study by Pilots drives another nail into a coffin of lies told
the American people by The 9/11 Commission

According to the report issued by Pilots for 9/11 Truth
(http://pilotsfor911truth.org/), there are major differences between the
official account and the flight data:

a. The NTSB Flight Path Animation approach path and altitude does not
support official events.
b. All Altitude data shows the aircraft at least 300 feet too high to have
struck the light poles.
c. The rate of descent data is in direct conflict with the aircraft being
able to impact the light poles and be captured in the Dept of Defense "5
Frames" video of an object traveling nearly parallel with the Pentagon
lawn.
d. The record of data stops at least one second prior to official impact
time.
e. If data trends are continued, the aircraft altitude would have been at
least 100 feet too high to have hit the Pentagon.

As Robert Balsamo, co-founder of Pilots for 9/11 Truth, observes, "The
information in the NSTB documents does not support, and in some instances
factually contradicts, the official government position that American
Airlines Flight 77 struck the Pentagon on the morning of September 11,
2001." The study was signed by fifteen professional pilots with extensive
military and commercial carrier experience. They have made their
animation, "Pandora's Box: Chapter 2," available to the public at

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Pandora's+Black+Box%3A+Chapter+2 .

According to James H. Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth
(http://911scholars.org), this result fits into the broader picture of
what happened at the Pentagon that day. "We have developed four lines of
argument that prove--conclusively, in my judgment--that no Boeing 757 hit
the building. The most important evidence to the contrary has been the
numerous eyewitness reports of a large commercial carrier coming toward
the building. If the NTSB data is correct, then the Pilot's study shows
that a large aircraft headed toward the building but did not impact with
it. It swerved off and flew above the Pentagon."

Fetzer, who retired last June after 35 years of teaching courses in logic,
critical thinking, and scientific reasoning, expressed pleasure over the
Pilot's results, which, he said, has neatly resolved the most pressing
issue that remained about the Pentagon. He added, "We have previously
developed several lines of argument, each of which proves that no Boeing
757 hit the building," including these four:

(1) The hit point at the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a 100-ton
airliner with a 125-foot wingspan and a tail that stands 44 feet above the
ground; the kind and quantity of debris was wrong for a Boeing 757: there
were no wings, no fuselage, no seats, no bodies, no luggage, no tail! Not
even the engines were recovered, and they are practically indestructible.

(2) Of an estimate 84 videotapes of the crash, the three that have been
released by the Pentagon do not show a Boeing 757 hitting the building, as
even Bill O'Reilly admitted when one was shown on "The Factor". At 155
feet, the plane was more than twice as long as the 77-foot Pentagon is
high and should have been visible. There are indications of a much smaller
plane, but not a Boeing 757.

(3) Indeed, the aerodynamics of flight would have made the official
trajectory--flying more than 500 mph barely above ground level--physically
impossible, because of the accumulation of a massive pocket of compressed
gas (air) beneath the fuselage; and if it had come it at an angle instead,
it would have created a massive crater; but there is no crater and the
official trajectory is impossible.

(4) Flying low enough to impact with the ground floor would have meant
that the enormous engines were plowing the ground and creating massive
furrows; but there are no massive furrows. The smooth, unblemished surface
of the Pentagon lawn thus stands as a "smoking gun" proving the official
trajectory cannot be sustained.

Members of Scholars have contributed to a new book that analyses the
government's official account, according to which 19 Islamic
fundamentalists hijacked four commercial airliners, outfoxed the most
sophisticated air-defense system in the world, and committed these
atrocities under the control of a man in a cave in Afghanistan. Entitled,
THE 9/11 CONSPIRACY (2007), it includes photographs of the hit point
before and after the upper floors collapsed, the crucial frame from the
released videos, and views of the clear, smooth, and unblemished lawn.

"Don't be taken in by photos showing damage to the second floor or those
taken after the upper floors collapsed, which happened 20-30 minutes
later," Fetzer said. "In fact, debris begins to show up on the completely
clean lawn in short order, which might have been dropped from a C-130 that
was circling above the Pentagon or placed there by men in suits who were
photographed carrying debris with them." The most striking is a piece from
the fuselage of a commercial airliner, which is frequently adduced as
evidence.

James Hanson, a newspaper reporter who earned his law degree from the
University of Michigan College of Law, has traced that debris to an
American Airlines 757 that crashed in a rain forest above Cali, Columbia
in 1995. "It was the kind of slow-speed crash that would have torn off
paneling in this fashion, with no fires, leaving them largely intact."
Fetzer has been so impressed with his research he has invited Hanson to
submit his study to Scholars for consideration for publication on its web
site, 911scholars.org.

"The Pentagon has become a kind of litmus test for rationality in the
study of 9/11," Fetzer said. "Those who persist in maintaining that a
Boeing 757 hit the building are either unfamiliar with the evidence or
cognitively impaired. Unless," he added, "they want to mislead the
American people. The evidence is beyond clear and compelling. It places
this issue 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. No Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon."