911 Variable Visibility Hologram Theory -- VVHT

• Imagine MANY OF the videos were "real" and SOME EYEWITNESSES saw a big plane.
• Imagine there REALLY WAS something of the 767 size in the observed 3D coordinates.

But it wasn't a 767, I can tell because of missing witnesses due to missing warning by the missing turbofan noise, and the missing realism of videos!!

Lets call it a hologramme!

A hologramme that is bright, and realistic from a close-up/favourable angle position (behind/below, Hezarkhani)
A hologramme that is dark from a distance and the illusion breaks up, i.e. wings flicker on and off.

Hologramme projectors: Big plane high in the sky somewhere and
helicopters hovering as supplemental or relay projectors. A missile (THE
POD) carrying the "projections screen" and a warhead.

A mechanism that creates the "impact holes" (and the tiny impact flash)

(some?) frontal shots (767 flying towards camera) are faked because the
hologramme does not work from that direction?

I know. Evidence is thin. It is based on THOM photo
http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/david-thom-pictures.html
showing enourmous bright light source during "ua175 impact" & bizarre
bright light on a chopper in the Rick Siegel video (not during impact, but
just before collapse! Maybe here a hologramme was used to HIDE something
that caused the collapse)
http://www.google.com/search?q=bright+light+rick+siegel+chopper

Technology used? Tom Bearden (cures cancer - time reversal - conjugate
mirror)!

see what I mean?

It fits the phenotype of the 911 organism, but the biology is pure magic
to us neanderthals. We just know it still bleeds.

I haven't got the time to study it further, but someone should scrutinise
reflection-intensities, light-angles, pods, nose-outs .. etc from all the
available vids and stills ... as well as evaluate eyewitness
locations/statements

Videos were faked...!! The crummy video quality (by professional TV
cameras) was intentional.

2ndplanevarious_a.mpg - Several views of the south tower plane crash from KTLA. Notice how the plane appears as a dark silhouette although the sun is behind the camera and the building is in full sun.

MORE VIDEOS:

http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/

THE NOSE OUT conundrum:

Easy. The missile that carried the "projection-screen-holo-dust" really did go through the tower and the holodust really DID disperse from the exit-hole and the image was "projected" onto it so the Airplane nose really made a re-appearance!

The exit hole:

Of course the hologram projection is not visible from the front.



Proof that there was a missile homing in from a steep trajectory is in the NBC Chopper 4 video -- only barely can a small object be seen:



whereas a boeing 767 would be as large as the impact hole!

MORE?

check these sites and form your own opinion.

The media and the US government LIE. YOu have to rely on alternative media, the blogosphere...

http://911logic.blogspot.com/2006/12/911-tv-fakery-pinocchio-part-iii.html

http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html

---

I think the my (variable visibility) hologram theory [VVHT] can be tested.
The photos and footage will be the main subject of investigation.

a source for video clips: http://houston.indymedia.org/news/2007/02/56511.php

A hologramme has specific properties that an aeroplane would not have.

But even without detailed study it is obvious that the rudder and wing-angles are DISTORTED. This may be an effect of the material used for the "virtual projection screen" or a result of the viewing angle.

FROM WIKIPEDIA:

Dynamic holography

The discussion above describes static holography, in which recording, developing and reconstructing occur sequentially and a permanent hologram is produced.

There exist also holographic materials which don't need the developing process and can record a hologram in a very short time. This allows to use holography to perform some simple operations in an all-optical way. Examples of applications of such real-time holograms include phase-conjugate mirrors ("time-reversal" of light), optical cache memories, image processing (pattern recognition of time-varying images), and optical computing.

The amount of processed information can be very high (terabit/s), since the operation is performed in parallel on a whole image. This compensates the fact that the recording time, which is in the order of a µs, is still very long compared to the processing time of an electronic computer. The optical processing performed by a dynamic hologram is also much less flexible than electronic processing. On one side one has to perform the operation always on the whole image, and on the other side the operation a hologram can perform is basically either a multiplication or a phase conjugation. But remember that in optics, addition and Fourier transform are already easily performed in linear materials, the second simply by a lens. This enables some applications like a device that compares images in an optical way [4].

The search for novel nonlinear optical materials for dynamic holography is an active area of research. The most common materials are photorefractive crystals, but also in semiconductors or semiconductor heterostructures (such as quantum wells), atomic vapors and gases, plasmas and even liquids it was possible to generate holograms.

A particularly promising application is optical phase conjugation. It allows the removal of the wavefront distortions a light beam receives when passing through an aberrating medium, by sending it back through the same aberrating medium with a conjugated phase. This is useful for example in free-space optical communications to compensate for atmospheric turbulence (the phenomenon that gives rise to the twinkling of starlight).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holography#Dynamic_holography

It is possible, using nonlinear optical processes, to exactly reverse the propagation direction and phase variation of a beam of light. The reversed beam is called a conjugate beam, and thus the technique is known as optical phase conjugation (also called time reversal, wavefront reversal and retroreflection).

One can interpret this nonlinear optical interaction as being analogous to a real-time holographic process. In this case, the interacting beams simultaneously interact in a nonlinear optical material to form a dynamic hologram (two of the three input beams), or real-time diffraction pattern, in the material. The third incident beam diffracts off this dynamic hologram, and, in the process, reads out the phase-conjugate wave. In effect, all three incident beams interact (essentially) simultaneously to form several real-time holograms, resulting in a set of diffracted output waves that phase up as the "time-reversed" beam. In the language of nonlinear optics, the interacting beams result in a nonlinear polarization within the material, which coherently radiates to form the phase-conjugate wave.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonlinear_optics#Optical_phase_conjugation


keywords: 911 WTC ua175 175 aa77 aa11 flight 11 flight 175 world trade center new york terrorists attacks 11. september 9/11 conspiracy theories cia mossad fbi mohammed atta hijackings boxcutters arab state terror hegelian dialectic gladio reichstag gleiwitz tonkin northwoods covert operation false flag black op special ops bush wolfowitz rumsfeld schmidt neocons netanjahu silverstein sharon tenet myers shelton kennedy jfk rfk elite buffett offutt us dollar collapse banking credit creation chomsky amy goodman democracy now intellectual corruption september clues tv fakery tvf npt no plane theory no big boeing judy wood beam weapons space brilliant pebbles star wars iran contra scalar weapons tom bearden russia ussr estonia plutonium weaponized hologramm atomic bomb nuclear china syndrome cassini reactor contamination bird flu anthrax aids lab biologial chemical laboratory saddam hussein hoax wmd weapons of mass destruction david thom pictures