The notorious Carmen Taylor Photographs of 911
HERE IS HOW I FOUND THE FILES:
http://webpages.acs.ttu.edu/wfryer/911/
(Carmen_Taylor_photos_4h43_-5h-to-gmt)
=== I have a local copy of
This is G o o g l e's cache of http://www.mirrors.org/historical/2001-09-11-World-Trade_Center/wtc/tabby/ as retrieved on 11 Jul 2007 02:27:44 GMT.
=== which gives original (Mavica) filenames but I DO NOT HAVE the files themselves
Index of /wtc/tabby
Name Last modified Size Description
Parent Directory 12-Sep-2001 12:36 -
MVC-008S.JPG 11-Sep-2001 13:48 24k
MVC-009S.JPG 11-Sep-2001 13:48 42k
MVC-011S.JPG 11-Sep-2001 13:48 42k
MVC-012S.JPG 11-Sep-2001 13:48 36k
MVC-017S.JPG 11-Sep-2001 13:48 25k
MVC-018S.JPG 11-Sep-2001 13:48 19k
MVC-019S.JPG 11-Sep-2001 13:48 31k
MVC-020S.JPG 11-Sep-2001 13:48 26k
MVC-024S.JPG 11-Sep-2001 13:48 26k
MVC-026S.JPG 11-Sep-2001 13:48 43k
MVC-027S.JPG 11-Sep-2001 13:48 33k
MVC-029S.JPG 11-Sep-2001 13:48 70k
Apache/1.3.6 Server at fear.exodus.net Port 80
Index of /vido/lager/bilder
Name Last modified Size Description
Parent Directory -
Mvc-006s.jpg 11-Sep-2001 08:08 92K
Mvc-008s.jpg 11-Sep-2001 08:07 67K
Mvc-009s.jpg 11-Sep-2001 08:05 62K
Thumbs.db 16-Mar-2004 13:03 11K
m006s.jpg 11-Sep-2001 08:08 4.5K
m008s.jpg 11-Sep-2001 08:07 3.4K
m009s.jpg 11-Sep-2001 08:06 3.3K
Apache/2.0.59 (NETWARE) mod_jk/1.2.15 Server at skolweb.hammaro.se Port 80
Here my observations of these photos:
03-Apr-04 16:34 25,020 MVC-008S.JPG
03-Apr-04 16:34 42,536 MVC-009S.JPG
03-Apr-04 16:34 43,194 MVC-011S.JPG
03-Apr-04 16:34 36,755 MVC-012S.JPG
03-Apr-04 16:34 25,939 MVC-017S.JPG
03-Apr-04 16:34 19,008 MVC-018S.JPG
03-Apr-04 16:34 32,106 MVC-019S.JPG
03-Apr-04 16:34 26,481 MVC-020S.JPG
03-Apr-04 16:34 26,644 MVC-024S.JPG
03-Apr-04 16:34 44,296 MVC-026S.JPG
03-Apr-04 16:34 33,913 MVC-027S.JPG
03-Apr-04 16:34 71,174 MVC-029S.JPG
If you look at the sequence of pictures she took, they look quite believable.
First she was on foot, then got on the boat, zoomed in, (wtc4 - wtc5) and then zoomed out (wtc6.jpg - the lucky shot with the 767 apparition) ...
These photos were apparently taken on 11 September with a Sony digital camera following the initial suicide terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York. The photographer captured the impact of the second aircraft.
wtc1.jpg 97,526
03-Apr-04 16:34 25,020 MVC-008S.JPG
.. about 10 seconds after NORTH TOWER explosion, taken from battery park
EDITED (LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01 568x426pixels, )
wtc2.JPG 42,536
03-Apr-04 16:34 42,536 MVC-009S.JPG
.. about 15 seconds after NORTH TOWER explosion, taken from battery park, ZOOMED IN
640x480, original small files size (around 40kB)
03-Apr-04 16:34 43,194 MVC-011S.JPG
wtc3.JPG 43,194
.. maybe 50 seconds after NORTH TOWER explosion, taken from battery park, ZOOMED OUT again
640x480, original small files size (around 40kB)
03-Apr-04 16:34 36,755 MVC-012S.JPG
wtc4.JPG 36,755
maximum zoom of fresh WTC1 explosion..
640x480, original small files size (around 40kB)
03-Apr-04 16:34 25,939 MVC-017S.JPG
wtc5.jpg caps?? 94,661
EDITED (LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01 568x426pixels)
03-Apr-04 16:34 19,008 MVC-018S.JPG
wtc6.jpg 77,696
showing the GHOST PLANE
EDITED (LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01 568x426pixels)
unsually smeared -- only 77kB rather than 90-120kB
03-Apr-04 16:34 32,106 MVC-019S.JPG
wtc7.jpg 118,848
EDITED (LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01 568x426pixels)
03-Apr-04 16:34 26,481 MVC-020S.JPG
wtc8.JPG 26,481
640x480, original small files size (around 40kB)
03-Apr-04 16:34 26,644 MVC-024S.JPG
wtc9.JPG 26,644
640x480, original small files size (around 40kB)
03-Apr-04 16:34 44,296 MVC-026S.JPG
wtc10.JPG 44,296
03-Apr-04 16:34 33,913 MVC-027S.JPG
wtc11.jpg 109,284
EDITED (LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01 568x426pixels)
03-Apr-04 16:34 71,174 MVC-029S.JPG
wtc12.JPG 71,174
640x480, original small files size (around 40kB)
back in the park.
Received: (qmail 49806 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2001 21:43:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO www.bgcons.com) (65.30.8.134)
by new-murphey.tenet.edu with SMTP; 11 Sep 2001 21:43:35 -0000
Received: from mtrudy (ws.bgcons.com [65.30.8.130])
by www.bgcons.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f8BLMSN07325;
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 16:22:28 -0500
Message-ID: <007801c13b0a$d662de80$4700a8c0@mtrudy>
Subject: Fw: Sad Day for all of us
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 16:43:41 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Additionally, 32 photos included in this PowerPoint presentation (converted to a webpage) are available.
Carmen Taylor
IMPORTANT READ THIS
Amateur Photographer Captures Attacks
By CAROLINE BYRNE, Associated Press Writer
Amateur photographer captures NYC attack. (AP Photo/Robert Bukaty) NEW YORK (AP) - Carmen Taylor had boarded the ferry to Ellis Island and was snapping photos of the Manhattan skyline Tuesday when the sky exploded.
"We thought it was fireworks," said Taylor, who had borrowed a Sony digital camera from her son for her five-day visit to New York from Ft. Smith, Ark.
Taylor, who works as an auditor in a nursing home, captured United Airlines Flight 175 as it shattered the south tower of the World Trade Center complex, just 18 minutes after American Airlines Flight 11 smashed into the north tower.
"I looked up again and this plane went by so I just put my camera back up. That's when the second explosion took place," she said.
"We were terrified. We were wondering if the Statue of Liberty was the next target and that's when people started streaming out of their buildings," Taylor said.
Taylor got off the ferry and showed her digital photos to the swarms of dazed office tower workers. One man suggested Taylor use his office nearby to e-mail her pictures to her local television station KHBS.
Two of her photos, one showing the scene just before the plane hit and the other immediately after, were distributed worldwide by The Associated Press.
Got that? She had just "boarded the ferry to Ellis Island and was snapping photos of the Manhattan skyline Tuesday when the sky exploded."
Recently, Ms. Taylor was interviewed and she said she took the picture from the ferry boat before it left.
Perhaps.
Michael Hezerkhani, who supposedly took the famous CNN "Ghostplane" footage, must have been on the same boat. Did anyone else on this tour boat get videos or photos of the second hit?
However, Ms. Taylor is lying about at least one thing. In the interview, she says the boat never left the dock after the second hit.
But look at the picture in the camera she is holding above. The picture in her camera shows a much more distant perspective of the towers than the famous AP photo above-- notice how the WTC towers stand out more from the surrounding buildings. This shot could only have been taken from further out than the dock-- from away out on the water.
So what else is she lying about?
There are other problems with Taylor's story--
1) the plane photo is a very professional-looking shot to be taken by an amateur with a old fashioned and relatively low quality digital camera.
2) there is the famous "pod-like" bulge under the starboard wing, which casts doubt upon the authenticity of this plane
3) the coloring on the plane is completely wrong for a United Airlines Boeing 767-- while there is a gray stripe down the bottom, the lower sides are dark BLUE, not light gray/light blue.
So the question is, WHO did take these pictures?
Carmen Taylor, or some professional photographer operative who inserted a digital plane into the shot?
Or is Taylor the operative? Or is she just a good "witness from middle America" to the second hit who is being used by the perps?
Either way, there is little doubt that there is something very wrong with her story.
Here is the series she supposedly took:
Ms. Taylor says she was at the end of the boat, sitting on a container. How did that gray-haired person get in front of her in the last shot?
Considering that the old digital camera she says she used had a very long lag time (up to 10 seconds) between shots, there is some doubt that she was able to take this series.
Heres a phone call to Carmen Taylor who took the famous photo "allegedly" of flight 175 going into the tower on 911
click link below to listen or right click and save target as to download:
http://www.pumpitout.com/audio/ct_101407.mp3
(17min Mp3 approx 3mb)
------------------------------------------------
The perspective of the image in the camera Carmen
Taylor is holding in the AP photo is clearly shot from
Hoboken and not from a bobbing ferry at Battery Park.
http://www.911researchers.com/node/998
---------------------------------------------
I talked to Carmen Taylor again to see what her answer was to the photo shown in her camera which looks like it was taken from Hoboken.
Now Carmen says that she was on the ferry when the second plane hit. Then, was "dumped back into Battery Park" where she found Doug Haluza ( phone call to Doug Haluza: http://www.pumpitout.com/audio/dh_110107.mp3 ) who took her to his office to download the pictures to her local news station. During the time they were in the office the towers had exploded to dust. After she sent the pictures to the news station she went back to Battery Park, got on another ferry and went to Hoboken where she said she did take more pictures.
click link below to listen or right click and save target as to download call:
http://www.pumpitout.com/audio/ct_103007.mp3
(approx 4mb 26min50sec Mp3)
Theres a problem! If Carmen ended up going to Hoboken after the towers were destroyed, how did she take the picture she is showing in her camera in the [AP] article (which has mysteriously dissapeared from the internet?) When asked about this, Carmen said the photograph could be fake!
I found Robert Bukaty who was credited with taking the photo in question. He verified that the photo of Carmen holding the camera with a picture showing the towers used in Caroline Byrne's article "Amateur Photographer Captures Attacks" is indeed the one he took!
phone call to Robert Bukaty (AP)
http://www.pumpitout.com/audio/rb_ap_110107.mp3
Here is a phone call to Kevin Kinder to verify the story Carmen told him:
http://www.pumpitout.com/audio/kk_nwanews_110107.mp3
Shes been telling the same story for 6 years, I would hope she had it down by now!
Its funny how she never met Hezarkhani that day since they would of had to be side by side with each other sitting on that metal box!
Even funnier is how she hadn't seen his famous footage until 6 months after 9/11!
What really bothers me is the pictures she claims to have taken with that camera, it is a "Sony MVC-FD73 0.3MP Mavica Digital Camera w/ 10x Optical Zoom." The camera saves the pictures to floppy disk and the pictures are really low quality. She said that she was zoomed in almost all the way,making the quality even worse. I really don't think that camera could have taken that picture, or any of the other ones!
Another problem with the camera (which she mentioned in the call) is with the lag time between shots. If you look at the Hezarkhani footage there is a time difference of 5 seconds between what would be her "plane pic" and the "devil face pic" The camera takes about 10 seconds to write to the disk before being able to snap another. Again, she couldn't have taken those pics with that camera!
"socialservice" was garcious enough to send me this link today to verify:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/998
On October 21, 2007, I found an uncropped version of
the Carmen Taylor photo on the "United Airlines Flight
175" Wikipedia article. The Carmen Taylor photo was
the top frame of three. The bottom two were stills
from the Michael Hezarkhani video. This image was
removed from Wikipedia on 21:51 GMT, 4 November 2007.
Even though Carmen Taylor and Michael Hezarkhani were
credited to have visually captured the highly
published image of United Airlines Flight 175 crashing
into the South Tower of the World Trade Center on
9/11, Wikipedia holds the position that Carmen Taylor
and Michael Hezarkhani lack the notability to have an
entry in their name. The Wikipedia article "United
Airlines Flight 175" is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject of which Doug Haluza is a
member. The 9/11 script is written that Doug Haluza
was the kindly businessman who "helped" Carmen Taylor
transmit her photo to television station KHBS.
This Google Image search shows the Carmen
Taylor/Michael Hezarkhani image that was removed from
the "United Airlines Flight 175" article.
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/35/Carmen_Taylor_Michael_Heza rkhani.jpg/140px-Carmen_Taylor_Michael_Hezarkhani.jpg&imgrefurl=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_175&h =321&w=140&sz=9&hl=en&start=31&um=1&tbnid=y7dgJtsIvjzPpM:&tbnh=118&tbnw=51&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dcarmen%2Btaylor%26start%3D2 0%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26sa%3DN
Notability of Carmen Taylor and Michael Hezarkhani
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:U2r2h
Intelius Search- Carmen R Taylor Lavaca, Arkansas
http://find.intelius.com/people-search-advanced.html
United States Copyright Office Catalog Search
Assassinating the President / by Carmen Taylor
Registration Number: TXu000374529
http://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DB=local&PAGE=First
This image was removed from the "United Airlines
Flight 175" Wikipedia article on 21:51 GMT, 4
November, 2007.
http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z13/AmandaReconwith/Carmen_Taylor_Michael_Hezarkhani.jpg
On November 6, 2007, Associated Press claims that the
Carmen Taylor photograph with the cyan and blurry
camera image is the one taken by AP photographer
Robert Bukaty on 9/11/01. In Jeff Hill's 11/01/07
conversation with Robert Bukaty he states that the
image in the camera Carmen Taylor was holding had a
very distant image which matches an uncredited
photograph from a Hoboken perspective used by the
University of Sydney School of Civil Engineering and
the Federal Research Program of the Library of
Congress. Is the camera that Carmen Taylor holds in
the Robert Bukaty photograph the one that took that
uncredited photo? Has the photo of Carmen Taylor that
AP published with the cyan and blurry camera image
been altered? One nice feature of a digital camera is
that what you see in the LCD screen is what you get in
the captured image. Why is the image in the camera so
light and so cyan with such little contract and
definition? A side by side comparison with an
uncropped photo that was removed from Wikipedia
demonstrates this anomaly. It took a multi step
process which reached the limits of lightness and
color balance to achieve similar distortions in hue,
chroma, brightness, contrast, and definition.
For those who read (and therefore are not born yesterday) here is lots more info on the subject:
http://www.progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=218&topic_id=6859&mesg_id=7078
09/12/2001 - Updated 10:28 AM ET
Digital camera, e-mail bring tragedy to the world
NEW YORK (AP) — Carmen Taylor had boarded the ferry to Ellis Island and was snapping photos of the Manhattan skyline Tuesday when the sky exploded. "We thought it was fireworks," said Taylor, who had borrowed a Sony digital camera from her son for her five-day visit to New York from Ft. Smith, Ark. Taylor, who works as an auditor in a nursing home, captured United Airlines Flight 175 as it shattered the south tower of the World Trade Center complex, just 18 minutes after American Airlines Flight 11 smashed into the north tower.
"I looked up again and this plane went by so I just put my camera back up. That's when the second explosion took place," she said."We were terrified. We were wondering if the Statue of Liberty was the next target and that's when people started streaming out of their buildings," Taylor said.Taylor got off the ferry and showed her digital photos to the swarms of dazed office tower workers. One man suggested Taylor use his office nearby to e-mail her pictures to her local television station KHBS.Two of her photos, one showing the scene just before the plane hit and the other immediately after, were distributed worldwide by The Associated Press.Taylor's friend Paula Harting was heading to a computer training course next to the Center when she heard a low plane overhead and looked up."It hit in slow motion. I could see the plane sticking out of the building and then slowly disappear into it," said Harting, visiting from East Greenbush, N.Y. "I can still see it."
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2001/09/12/attack-digipics.htm
Earth's magnetic field:
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home