Friday, May 27, 2011

HONDURAS - President R E T U R N !!!!

Tomorrow, on Saturday, May 28, almost two years after having been ousted as president in an SOA graduate-led military coup and flown out of the country in his pajamas, Manuel Zelaya will return to Honduras.
FINALLY - people friendly presidents - non corporate slaves!  Non-CIA!

SOA Watch has been invited to join President Zelaya on his plane flight back into his home country. Father Roy Bourgeois and I will join other human rights advocates and political leaders in accompanying Manuel Zelaya on his flight back to Honduras. We are deeply humbled and grateful for the invitation to represent the SOA Watch movement at this historic moment in this struggle for justice.

The Honduran National Resistance Front against the Coup (FNRP) is planning a massive mobilization to celebrate Manuel Zelaya's return and will meet our plane at the international airport of Toncontin in Tegucigalpa. After the landing, we will converge on the Plaza Isy Obed Murillo, south of the airport, where we will honor the martyrs who fell after the military coup. Zelaya's return was made possible after the governments of Venezuela and Colombia brokered an agreement between Porfirio Lobo, the head of the current regime in Honduras and President Manuel Zelaya.

It is a privilege to accompany the people of Honduras in this moment. Their brave commitment to return their nation to democracy has come at a terribly high price: that of dozens of lives lost. The return of President Zelaya is an enormous first step, but we are mindful that much remains to be done to guarantee the protection of human rights for the people of Honduras. SOA Watch supports the tireless work of Honduran human rights defenders such as those of COFADEH, the Committee of Families of Detained and Disappeared of Honduras.

We join in the joy of the people of Honduras and reaffirm our commitment to continue to support and accompany the Honduran social movements in their struggle for justice.

Un abrazo,
Bookmark and Share
posted by u2r2h at 8:17 AM 0 comments

Monday, May 16, 2011

STRAUSS KAHN did not flee, maid worked 3 years at hotel

photo of his court appearance, unshaven, tired.

Strauss-Kahn did not flee his hotel after the alleged assault but was rushing to a lunch appointment with a witness who will testify to that affect

16 may 2011 1633 GMT: The judge has denied Dominique Strauss-Kahn bail and ordered the IMF chief to be detained, two days after he was pulled off a plane and accused of trying to rape a Manhattan hotel chambermaid

Judge Melissa Jackson said he should be remanded because he was "a flight risk."

defence lawyer Ben Brafman said it was "quite likely he will be exonerated". Earlier they said Strauss-Kahn had agreed to undergo scientific and forensic tests and intends to "vigorously" defend himself.

The prosecution on Monday compared Strauss-Kahn to Roman Polanski, the film director who fled the US in 1978 after pleading guilty to unlawful sexual intercourse with an underage girl. Prosecutors said they were investigating an additional incident, without specifying what it related to, and that they were waiting for the forensic information from the hotel.

The defence offered $1m (£618,000) bail and said the IMF chief was prepared to reside with his daughter in Manhattan and wear an electronic bracelet. But the judge refused.

Strauss-Kahn appeared tired, impassive and dishevelled at the hearing, having waited for the court to deal with a string of more mundane cases involving three men accused of minor drugs offences.

He was charged with assaulting a

32-year-old maid at the Sofitel hotel in Manhattan.

Jorge Tito, the managing director of Sofitel New York, said he could not comment on the case.

"However, we want to stress that our employee has been working with Sofitel New York for three years and we have been completely satisfied with the quality of her work and behaviour."

The 32-year-old hotel worker told police she entered Strauss-Kahn's room to clean it at around 1pm on Saturday. He allegedly emerged from the bathroom naked, ran after her and dragged her into a bedroom where he began sexually assaulting her on the bed.

According to the police account of the "brutal" attack, he locked the door to the suite, then dragged the maid down a hallway into a bathroom where he assaulted her again. The woman escaped from the room and was later treated in hospital for minor injuries. Police found Strauss-Kahn had left his room seemingly "in a hurry", leaving behind personal items including his phone.

IMF chief faces 20 years' jail over alleged assault

Date: May 17 2011

Simon Mann

WASHINGTON: Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the French head of the International Monetary Fund, was due to appear in a New York court yesterday to face charges that he sexually assaulted a hotel maid in Manhattan at the weekend.

His appearance had been delayed by 24 hours as prosecutors sought additional evidence and so that he could submit to a forensic medical examination.

Investigators have been gathering possible DNA evidence from his skin and from beneath his fingernails as a means of supporting allegations of the attack.

They were hunting for ''the classic things you get in association with a sex assault'', a police official told The New York Times.

Earlier Mr Strauss-Kahn was identified by the maid, 32, in a police line-up at the New York Police Department Special Victims Unit in Harlem, where Mr Strauss-Kahn had been held since being hauled off a Paris-bound Air France aircraft late on Saturday afternoon.

The IMF managing director, touted as a likely Socialist Party contender in the French presidential election next year, denies attacking and trying to rape the maid at the five-star Sofitel Hotel on West 44th Street, near Times Square, about 1pm on Saturday.

Speaking to reporters outside Manhattan Criminal Court late on Sunday evening, William Taylor, a lawyer, said Mr Strauss-Kahn had ''willingly consented to a scientific and forensic examination''.

''At the request of the government, and in light of the hour, we have agreed to postpone the arraignment until [Monday] morning.''

Asked about his client's well-being, Mr Taylor responded: ''He's tired but he's fine.''

A top New York defence lawyer, Benjamin Brafman, who is also working on the case, reiterated that Mr Strauss-Kahn, 62, ''intends to vigorously defend these charges and denies any wrongdoing''.

The career of one of the world's most prominent financiers was hanging in the balance as further details emerged of the sequence of events on Saturday that led to his arrest.

Police said the maid had immediately alerted hotel security to the alleged assault on Saturday but before police could arrive Mr Strauss-Kahn had fled, leaving behind his mobile phone and some personal items.

While they were interviewing staff, Mr Strauss-Kahn apparently phoned the hotel to report his phone missing, advising them that he was at John F. Kennedy International Airport preparing to board the 4.40pm flight to Paris.

Detectives boarded the plane moments before its scheduled departure and took Mr Strauss-Kahn, who was in the first-class cabin, into custody.

Mr Strauss-Kahn, who had been heading to Europe for critical meetings with finance ministers over a multibillion-euro bailout for Portugal and Greece's deteriorating debt position, was charged at 2.15am Sunday with a criminal sexual act, attempted rape and an unlawful imprisonment.

The IMF boss, who is paid about $US420,000 ($398,000) a year tax-free, is alleged to have tried to force the maid to have oral sex in his $US3000-a-night suite after she apparently entered thinking it was empty.

According to the police account, the maid apologised and tried to leave but Mr Strauss-Kahn, who had appeared naked from a bathroom, allegedly attacked her, dragging her into another room where, he forced himself upon her. He is also alleged to have tried to lock her in a room.

Mr Strauss-Kahn's third wife, the French TV personality and millionaire art heiress Anne Sinclair, was at the couple's Paris apartment at the time of the alleged assault. She told reporters: ''I do not believe for a single second the accusations levelled against my husband. I do not doubt his innocence will be established. I appeal for restraint and decency.''

The identity of the maid was not disclosed. But a spokesman for the Sofitel's owner, the Accor Group, said she had worked at the hotel for three years ''and was completely satisfactory in terms of her work and behaviour''.

The New York Times reported that she lived in the Bronx, where she had moved into an apartment with a teenage daughter a few months ago. ''They're good people,'' the paper quoted a neighbour as saying. ''Every time I see her I'm happy because we're both from Africa. She's never given a problem for nobody. Never noisy. Everything nice.''

Mr Strauss-Kahn, who has no diplomatic immunity, faces up to 20 years' jail if convicted. He was expected to seek bail yesterday.

The IMF moved to quell concerns about the Washington-based organisation's continuing role in the rescue of the global economy by appointing its No. 2 executive, John Lipsky, as acting chief.

The former US Treasury official and investment banker, who had previously said that he would leave the IMF at the end of August, chaired an informal session of the fund's board on Sunday afternoon in Washington.

A spokesman said his appointment was ''in line with standard IMF procedures''.

Marine Le Pen, head of France's far-right National Front party, said on Sunday that sexual assault charges against IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn had crushed his hopes of running in a 2012 presidential election.

"The case and the charges ... mark the end of his campaign and pre-campaign for the presidency and will most likely prompt the IMF to ask him to leave his post," Le Pen told i-Tele television.

A lawyer representing Strauss-Kahn, Benjamin Brafman, told Reuters in an email that the IMF chief would plead not guilty.

One of Strauss-Kahn's French-based lawyers, Leon Lef Forster, told Reuters: "We must wait until things settle and see if it's true or a provocation. We must be especially careful not to get into a media circus and we must wait until things are clear."

Le Pen, who took over the National Front leadership from her father Jean-Marie in January, has been ranked in second place to Strauss-Kahn in recent polls, which indicated she could knock out Sarkozy in a first-round vote and go on to a runoff against the IMF chief.

Bookmark and Share
posted by u2r2h at 10:35 AM 0 comments

Saturday, May 07, 2011

exu2r2h 911 book - free download - Judy Wood must hear

Dr Judy Wood - WTC Destruction - Truth Quest - 14 Jul 2009.mp3 (19.4 MB) (Modified: Jul 19 2009 09:21:57 PM)


What really happened on 9/11? What can the evidence tell us? Who is covering up the evidence, and why are they covering it up? This book attempts to give some answers to these questions and has been written by someone who has become deeply involved in research into what happened on 9/11. A study of the available evidence will challenge you and much of what you assumed to be true. "Now we are discovering that there is a highly-sophisticated black-ops weaponization of free energy technology and it was responsible for the bizarre, low-temperature pulverization of the Twin Towers. Dr. Judy Wood has pieced together the physical evidence and Andrew Johnson has highlighted who is working to silence or smear whom, as the powers that be rush to impede or at least contain the dissemination of these startling findings." - Conrado Salas Cano, M.S. in Physics ** NOTE: Book is sold at cost price and the cover price pays for printing - no money goes to the author or Dr Judy Wood. **

Download the entire book for free:

9/11 Finding the Truth by Andrew Johnson
10 Jul 2009
by Peter Taylor-Wood
9/11 Finding the Truth shows there is more to the Truth about 9/11 than meets the eye. Like most people I kept watching the Towers "come down" at free fall speed & it did not sit right. Then I discovered & my eyes where opened. Andrew Johnson certainly achieves his objectives - which are to expose another level of intrigue beyond the official explanations of 9/11. Dr.Wood has set out what actually happened & provides a powerful case through her investigation presenting clear evidence. Her point is to establish WHAT happened before we can begin to explore any further. AJ exposes that many concerned with 9/11 are ignoring the most relevant facts & the hostility towards Dr.Wood by many "Gurus" of the truth movement leads to the conclusion that the "Truth Movement" itself has been hijacked by those who wish to hide the Truth from us. I was astounded by Dr. Wood's work & amazed that her evidence was being derided by so many. The Truthers are drawing the conclusion that 9/11 was an inside Job from an assumption that it was a controlled demolition. Dr.Wood demonstrates that this was not the case & I see no evidence to support the Demolition Theory only personal assaults on Dr.Wood & AJ . This book includes transcriptions of interviews with the Gurus of the "Truth Movement". One realises that setting it down on the page gives one a better chance to review. It is revealing that these respected Scientists are trying to "muddy the water" and create confusion in a most unscientific way. Hard not to think "Are these people really scientists." even "Are these people really Adults" Of particular relevance is the portion dealing with 9/11 Truther Ace Bakers attempts to discredit the "Hutchison Effect". Setting up a bogus video & dismissing all other criteria of a scientific experiment could have no meaning other than to cast doubt on the credibility of Ace Baker... The Hutchison Effect would not be taken seriously if it was just based on videos. That would be like saying Ghosts are real as we have video evidence of them or conversely that Ghosts can't be real because someone once faked a video. Bakers attitude seems unhinged yet what is astounding is that Jim Fetzer, a principal "Guru" of the "Truth movement", sees Bakers fake video as proof that the Hutchison effect is fake.
All of the work contained in this book confirms that something is very wrong within the Truth movement. Jim Fetzer's dismissal of the Hutchison Effect is crucial to understanding the meaning of the deception as the Hutchison Effect is central to an understanding of what went on on 9/11. Most are aware of the basic Tenets of the 9/11 truth movements "Inside Job" theory and it's implications. Dr.Wood's evidence reaches very different - perhaps graver conclusions. The extent of the distortions that AJ reveals show a very real problem within the "Truth Movement" & that perhaps the Whole world has been Hijacked by the perpetrators of this act. 9/11 Finding the Truth is an exciting read. It involves the reader in a very personal way. It was helpful also in demonstrating the skills of those who set out to discredit Dr.Wood's work and reputation. Part of the Book deals with an anonymous bet sent to AJ. It is uncomfortable to read and yet helpful in relation to dealing with a "disinfo" agent with a very high degree of training in Psychology.
In conclusion this book is immensely valuable to anyone who takes the Future of this planet seriously. It is obvious that 9/11/01 was the most significant day in the History of the "Modern World". It is not just an event in the past but an event of which the Truth is only just dawning.

If you've ever wondered why the "9/11 Truth" movement hasn't made more headway and why there's so much disagreement on how the crime was committed, here's your answer. Author, Andrew Johnson, introduces us to the work of former professor of mechanical engineering, Dr. Judy Wood, and inventor, John Hutchison, to reveal how free energy technology and weather manipulation was used to destroy the World Trade Center towers in mere seconds on 9/11/01. He then explains how many luminaries of the "9/11 Truth Movement" are leading devoted followers astray with false theories to disguise the true nature of the crime.

Through Johnson's compilation of articles we learn about Dr. Wood's lawsuit accusing NIST contractors, such as Applied Research Associates and Science Applications International Corp., of using Directed Energy Weapons to create the event now known as "9/11". We further discover how John Hutchison's 1979 "Hutchison Effect" invention was investigated by the Pentagon, Lockheed Martin Skunkworks, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and NASA and how it fits into this diabolical picture.

This was Bill Biggart's final photograph. He was killed when the second World Trade tower
collapsed on top of him. He was 53 years old. WHERE IS THE DEBRIS OF 110 STORIES? It looks like the buildings were DEMATERLIALIZED?

Johnson presents his evidence in a carefully-reasoned, dispassionate manner, inviting us to reassess everything we thought we knew about this world-changing event. As Dr. Wood explains it, "We stand today at the dawn of an entirely new age. Man has in his hands a method of disrupting the molecular basis for matter and the ability to split the earth in half on a moment's notice. (It gives the term, "scorched-earth policy" a new significance.) The technology that was demonstrated on 911 can split the earth in half or it can be used to allow ALL people to live happily ever after with free energy.

However, he who controls the energy, controls the people. Control of energy leads to destruction of the planet.

But we have a choice. And this choice is real. Live happily ever after or destroy the planet. This is why I have been studying the evidence of what happened on 9/11. This evidence is central to it all. 9/11 was a demonstration of a new technology; free energy. It can be used for good, but we need to make that choice and help others to as well.

We have a choice."

Kathy Roberts
Berkeley, CA
Steel disolves in mid air on the way down. Watch the VIDEOS and be amazed.
Many thanks to you Andrew for your fine work. If folks would simply investigate for themselves the excellent research of Dr. Judy Wood (, they would have an understanding of what really happened on 9-11, as shocking as it may be. When we love the truth, we will not be deceived.


Cathy Palmer

Andrew Johnson has been working to self-publish a number of the articles posted on
The result is a 300-page 6x9 book with a cover graphic design by Nick Buchanan. The cover price (the entirety of which goes to is £6.55 - probably around $9 or $10. There is a button where you can download the whole thing for free though (partly why I decided to use lulu).
Feel free to re-post this on blogs, websites etc.

14-15 July 2009
Judy Wood is the guest of Eric Karlstrom and Melodee on "Truth Quest," on KHEN 106.9

Archived: (mp3)(25.8 MB)],

Webpages of Eric Karlstrom: here, and here. Show archives
Related Links

Figure D. Notice how straight the vertical holes were that cut down through WTC6.While there is abundance of aluminum cladding on the roofs of buildings 5 and 6, there is little or none in the holes.
(9/??/01) source ["Bullet Holes"]
Figure E. A view over the dome of WFC2 shows the damage to WTC6 in the center of the photo. To the left is the remains of WTC7. To the right is the remaining north wall of WTC1 which leans toward WTC6.

Figure 40a. Car 2723 was toasted inside and out... and rusted.
(9/12?/01) Source
["Wax Job"]
Figure 40b. There is extensive damage to the front of car 2723, including no door handle on the driver's door. There is an unusual, unburned circular area on the rear door. Note the open trunk.
(9/12?/01) Source

Figure 49.
(after 9/11/01) source:
["Swiss-cheese truck"]
Figure 50.
(after 9/11/01) Source

["Century-21 Street Windows"]
Figure 95. A toasted mail truck faces westward, parked behind the Postal building on the north side of Barclay Street. City Hall Park can be seen in the distance, across Church street. This damage does not appear to have been caused by a "normal" fire. There is no obvious sign of burned paper. The appearance of the back wheel area of the mail truck looks as if something radiated outward from the wheel. It is very unlikely this mail truck was hit by debris, unless this debris did not follow the laws of physics and made several right-angle turns along its path to the mail truck. Curiously, the mail truck parked behind it looks OK.

The paper still has its color, indicating this filing cabinet did not shrivel due to conventional heat.

For students progressing through academic studies and disciplines, one of
the key skills that is developed is the one of critical thinking. In order to
develop our understanding of a subject, we should question what we are
being told and, sometimes, how the information is being presented. Only
when we can answer questions we have about a subject to our satisfaction
can we say that we understand that subject. However, perhaps we should
pause and consider, can we usefully apply similar critical thinking skills
more widely?
For example, when considering daily news reports, how often do we stop
and think "How accurate is this information? What is the source?" or
"How has this or that conclusion been drawn?" "Is the information
complete?" There are two expressions that are pertinent to the thrust of
what I am saying: "Don't believe what you read in the papers!" and
"Never believe anything until it's been officially denied." The latter saying
is attributed to the writers of "Yes Minister", Jonathan Lynn & Antony
In recent years I have found I have to apply critical thinking much more
widely to news reports, following a realisation I had, some time in 2004,
that the Official Story of the attacks on 9/11 could not be true. A video I
watched clearly showed how the World Trade Centre Towers in New
York could not have been destroyed solely as a result of jet impacts and
burning jet fuel. It seems strange to some people that anyone should
question any of the essential elements of the official story of 9/11, which
is now widely recognized as the trigger for the global "War on Terror" - a
basis for many significant elements of foreign policy, and even domestic
Discussing the topic of what really happened on 9/11 is not an easy task –
not least because of the trauma it caused for the people who were killed,
injured or affected by it. The profoundly troubling nature of the event
alone is a powerful deterrent to people who wish to re-examine the
official accounts of what happened, and question the conclusions the
official enquiries have drawn. To date, no criminal prosecutions have been
successfully brought against anyone – in relation to the crimes committed
on 9/11 or the crimes committed in its cover up.
As an event, 9/11 is mentioned almost daily in news reports, though in
reality we have not really had all that much analysis of what actually
happened. The "run up" to 9/11 has been the subject of a significant BBC
documentary series called The Power of Nightmares, which first aired in
2004. This BAFTA award winner, made by Adam Curtis, exposes the real
history of Al Qaida and concludes that stories of this group's ability to
commit acts of terrorism on a large scale have been grossly exaggerated, if
not completely fabricated.
In this book, readers who are unhappy with the official account and have
questions about how and why certain things happened on 9/11 should
find many threads to follow. These threads will lead them to a wider
understanding of what happened then, and those same threads may
ultimately lead them to an understanding of a much, much larger tapestry
of reality.
The articles herein are more concerned with the criminal cover up of
9/11, rather than trying to identify the real perpetrators of atrocities
committed on the day itself. Readers, therefore, who are comfortable with
the "Al Qaida did it" story need not read any further than this paragraph.
Scope of 9/11 Evidence Concerned
This work is mainly concerned with the evidence related to what
happened at the World Trade Centre Complex – as exposed through the
research (primarily) of Dr. Judy Wood. Therefore, matters related to what
happened at the Pentagon, at Shanksville and the details of what
happened to WTC 7 are not discussed here. It is therefore primarily
aspects of physical evidence that are covered (inasmuch as the very
presentation and most likely explanation of this physical evidence is what
has been the target of attacks on this research).
Who is Covering Up 9/11?
It is difficult to accept how deep and wide the cover up of 9/11 actually
is. The very magnitude of this cover up is enough to make many people
scoff, roll their eyes or utter a sentence including a phrase such as
"conspiracy theorist". Typically, they may then dismiss, deny or simply
ignore any evidence presented which proves the official story of 9/11
cannot be true. Some people, whilst acknowledging that the official story
cannot be true, then assume that not enough information is available to
say anything else with a sufficient degree of certainty.
However, we must remember that US Government bodies and private
contractors took public money to fund research which was supposed to
explain what happened on 9/11. As informed citizens, I think we should
try to be sure that what they are telling us in their official (and very
lengthy) reports is true.

NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), was tasked with
analysing the cause of the destruction of WTC towers 1,2 and 7. When
studied objectively, their report for WTC 1 & 2 fails to answer how the
"pancake" collapse theory explains the evidence observed on the day –
such as the complete pulverisation of most of the towers - including
hundreds of steel girders – in about 10 seconds each. Readily available
photos also illustrate the glaring lack of any "pancakes" in the WTC
rubble pile.
Elements of the final NIST WTC reports have been the subject of a Legal
Challenge by Professors Morgan Reynolds (Emeritus, Texas A & M
University) and Professor of Mechanical Engineering Judy Wood
(formerly of Clemson University, South Carolina). Their challenge was
first made as a "Request for Correction" and then in two "Qui Tam"
cases. These cases, unsealed in 2007, outlined how, as it is framed, the
NIST study of the WTC collapse was fraudulent and deceptive. Indeed,
the very title of the main report "The Collapse of the World Trade Centre
Towers" is itself misleading, because the towers did not collapse, they
turned to dust.
How is it that the World's media chose to completely ignore Press
Releases, which described the initiation of legal cases against NIST's
contractors by two American Professors?
A Layered Cover Up
The bulk of these articles have been written in the period 2007-2009, in an
attempt to document the history of what may become known as the
"Second Layer" of the 9/11 Cover Up. The first layer of the 9/11 Cover
Up is the official and physically impossible "Al-Qaida-centred" fantasy,
accompanied by the significantly fraudulent NIST reports. The second
layer of the cover up includes supposedly more scientific analysis by some
researchers/scientists which suggests that bombs and/or thermite (or
some variant thereof) were placed in the WTC. A number of higher
profile "9/11 Sceptic" figures claim there is good evidence for the use of
thermite and/or bombs (but those same researchers have failed to
compile any of this evidence into a legal case against NIST or anyone
else). The same figures typically still go-along with the TV-reality of real
Boeing planes hitting the WTC towers, even though this story is
demonstrably impossible (largely because of Newton's third Law). The
difficulty for most people here is that it takes time to digest the evidence -
and undo the effects of years of media/TV programming. In my own
case, even though by about August 2004, I knew the official story of 9/11
was false, it was not until about 2 years later that I realised the plane
crashes at the WTC could not have been real (even though it seems that
something hit the WTC towers). Articles in this work discuss and explain
this conclusion more fully.
On the internet, I have posted a report detailing the previous 2 years of
campaigning efforts1 – completed before I realised there was an ongoing
effort to discourage and discredit certain threads of 9/11 research.

So, what is the truth? How do you find it? Can anything be proved? Well,
before becoming too philosophical, let me offer you something –
evidence. My own way of establishing what is true and what is not is to
constantly examine evidence – and try to re-evaluate my own conclusions
whenever new evidence appears (and at the same time, we must be wary
of falsified evidence and even the timing of its revelation). I might point
out that court cases, investigations etc. are sometimes re-opened and
appeals are initiated when new evidence comes to light.
The Importance of Establishing What Did Not
Happen on 9/11
By studying the evidence carefully, we can have a better chance of saying
with certainty what did not happen even if we cannot always say exactly
what did happen.
In some cases, laws of physics can be used to establish what can and cannot
have happened – we can check the consistency of a set of evidence. This
includes the use of things like the Law of Gravity – and also the
properties of materials (hardness/softness) and limits of their behaviour.
As well as evidence of physical events, witness testimony and behaviour is
also important. In relation to the development of 9/11 research, I have
tried to watch carefully for instances of "attacking the messenger" rather
than explaining the data, discouraging study of certain topics or evidence,
mis-direction, inconsistent or false statements, reluctance to answer
questions relating to evidence (when relevant). My goal in the majority of
this work is not necessarily to "judge" those people who are helping the
9/11 cover up. I am trying to illustrate how the "psychology of the cover
up" has unfolded and how subtle (and not so subtle) tactics are used to
influence people's views and conclusions.
Truth, Authority, Power and Corruption
Presentation, discussion and analysis of evidence is (or should be) the
guiding principle behind real scientific progress and discovery. It should
also be the guiding principle behind a fair legal/justice system. However,
it can be strongly argued that both these systems are only as fair and
honest as those who become figures of "authority" within them. When
people are given authority, they have power over others (by definition).
And therein is the rub – power corrupts and absolute power corrupts
absolutely. Perhaps it is true that only when some entities have absolute
power do operations like 9/11 – and its successful cover up – become
Education and "Academic Excellence"
It is said, by some, that going through the educational system hampers
one's ability to think freely (though this seems to be in contradiction to
the idea of being able to think critically) – perhaps this is due to the
process of being "spoon fed" information. Most students, especially in
their formative years, either implicitly assume the information is truthful
and/or valid, or they are chastised if they persistently question or

challenge the "prevailing view" about a topic. In higher (university level)
education, however, one is expected to be able to think freely – to
perform research, to analyse, compare and contrast information and to
draw conclusions. The problem is, perhaps, not so much the educational
system itself, but the interests it serves – and the institutionalisation of the
system itself, as well as the system of awards – both in the form of grants
and for "academic excellence" and the various prizes that are given.
Relying on sources of funding creates a vested interest and it was this that
President Eisenhower seemed to be referring to in his landmark 1961 final
address to the American Nation, before he left office. He said
Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes
virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. The prospect of domination of the
nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of
money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.
Also, winning awards tends to build up egos and it can constrain the
boundaries in which those award-winners feel comfortable operating –
and perhaps makes them less willing to challenge established paradigms. I
would argue this, therefore, makes them more dogmatic and unwilling to
review new evidence. Again, I would contend that President Eisenhower
wanted to highlight this issue in the same speech…
Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we
must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself
become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.
For this reason, I included audio segments of this speech at the beginning
of a presentation I compiled which summarises some of the main research
and evidence discussed in this collection of articles.

In all of this, my prime message and statement would be "Don't let
anyone give you your opinion – check and validate as much as you can
and continually question authority". Questions should be asked of both
recognized authorities (such as a scientific, governmental or nongovernmental
institutions) and of "unofficial authority" such as an
experienced researcher or research group, speaker or author.
I strongly contend that because no organised institution of any significant
size (such as the Church, The Legal System, any Major Government etc),
after over 7 years, has publicly spoken out to significantly disagree with
the official story of 9/11, it is clear the institutions cannot "handle" the
truth of what really happened on 9/11. Therefore, the future is in our
hands – yours and mine - we have the power to create and transform our
future – with every action we take and every word we say.

Now weep.

Bookmark and Share
posted by u2r2h at 7:51 AM 0 comments

exu2r2h The Matrix - Prophetic Film - 911 coincidence.

There is a 911 coincidence... unbelievable stuff! The date is not in the original script, but the CIA has a hand in the making of every movie in the USA. Could it be that the date was planned that long in advance?? The weather manipulation evidence (Wood) is just too much of a coincidence again!! amazing!!!
YES! -- 10 Sept 2001!! and guess what... the hurrican is headed for New York...
(to wash away the evidence? In any case, it changes course like a dogleg

Full story on the hurricaine is here

Bizarre Coincidence - Neo's Passport Expiry Date was 11th September 2001

This is a weird one! I was recently sent an e-mail from a friend who pointed out that in the 1999 cult film The Matrix, we see a file folder about 17 minutes into the film which very briefly shows an image of (the Keanu Reeves character) Neo's passport.In the film, the image appears up-side down as we see above.Interestingly if we rotate the image the right way up we can see that the expiry date of the passport is... 11th September 2001 (see below).

"Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself."

This is not a photoshop fakery. Dig out a copy of the DVD and go 17 approx minutes in and you can verify for yourself as we have done.Understandably this story is currently doing the rounds on some other websites, though we would add that this is not the first bizarre one that we have seen.In March 2001, the American Fox TV network aired the Pilot episode of the short lived series The Lone Gunmen (which was a 'spin-off' series from The X-Files series). The main plot of this show focused on a plan by rogue elements of the US government to hijack a jet aircraft by remote control and crash it into the World Trade Center, in order to justify an increase on military spending and a war on terror. Other anecdotal examples in entertainment such as these are the CD album Coup - Party Music which as we have reported elsewhere was released just months before their graphic depiction of an attack on the WTC Twin Towers was realised (below).




Date of last amendment or
addition: 22 July, 1998
Personal Details
Name: Thomas A Anderson
Date of Birth: 11 March, 1962
Place of Birth: Lower Downtown, Capital City,

Mother's maiden name: Michelle McGahey
Father's Name: John Anderson
Marital status: Single
Education Record
Schools attended: Central West Junior High
School Owen Paterson High

High School Record

Anderson excelled in the sciences, mathematics and
computer courses. He also displayed some aptitude for
English and History. After some trouble with disci-
pline at the age of 13-14, Anderson settled down to
become a fairly well-regarded member of the school
community. This was mainly due to an increased
involvement in sports, especially football and hockey.

The remainder of the first page of the file is not shown in sufficient detail for transcription. More information is provided on another page in the file which displays a passport:

Type: P
Surname: Anderson
First Name: Thomas A.
Nationality: United States of America
Date of Birth: 13 Sep 71
Sex: M
Place of Birth: Capital City
Date of Effect: 12 Sep 91
Date of Expiry: 11 Sep 01

"Some personal information can be seen on Thomas Anderson's "criminal record" that Agent Smith glances at when he interrogates Neo: The last update to the file was July 22, 1998 Neo's date of birth is "March 11, 1962" Neo's place of birth is "Lower Downtown, Capitol City" Neo's mother's maiden name is "Michelle McCahey" Neo's father's name is "John Anderson" Neo attended "Central West Junior High" and "Owen Paterson High" (named after the film's production designer). Seconds later a photocopy of his passport can be seen. There the place of his birth is CAPITAL CITY USA, his date of birth is the 13th of September 1971, the passport was issued on the 12th of September 1991 and will expire on the 11th of September 2001."

The Matrix is a 1999 science fiction action film written and directed by Larry and Andy Wachowski and starring Keanu Reeves, Laurence Fishburne, Carrie-Anne Moss, Joe Pantoliano, and Hugo Weaving. It was first released in the USA on March 31, 1999, and is the first entry in The Matrix series of films, comics, video games and animation.

The film describes a future in which reality perceived by humans is actually the Matrix, a simulated reality created by sentient machines in order to pacify and subdue the human population while their bodies' heat and electrical activity are used as an energy source. Upon learning this, computer programmer "Neo" is drawn into a rebellion against the machines. The film contains numerous references to the cyberpunk and hacker subcultures; philosophical and religious ideas; and homages to Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, Hong Kong action movies, Spaghetti Westerns and Japanese animation.

Thursday, 5 April, 2001, 07:02 GMT 08:02 UK
Twin towers to be demolished
Kincardine Power Station
The chimneys are visible for miles
One of Central Scotland's most famous landmarks, the twin chimneys at Kincardine Power Station, are to be demolished.

About 80 nearby houses will be evacuated as the 400ft towers on the edge of the River Forth are blown up.

The low lying countryside along the banks of the River Forth mean the two chimneys are clearly visible for miles.

Together they weigh 15,000 tonnes and consist of four million bricks.

The power station began generating in l958, producing electricity until 10 years ago.

Energy consumption

Its lifetime output of 51,000 gigawatt hours is roughly equivalent to Scotland's total energy consumption over a two year period.

The station was fuelled by small coal, called slack, from nearby pits, and burned up to 2.5 million tonnes a year.

In its heyday it employed nearby 500 staff and for two years running, won the accolade of the UK's most efficient power station.

Two local people will press the plunger to blow up the chimneys.

As well as houses being evacuated, there will also be temporary road closures.

Interesting that 3/11 was also mentioned in the films. that date links to the Madrid bombings. The date listed was 3/11/1962, 42 years prior to the Madrid bombings. I suppose a link could be made with the number 42 and George W Bush, since he is the 42nd person to be president.

The dates of September 11, 12, and 13 are all present on Neo's passport.
I would really love to know who decided that Neo's passport should include those specific details.

It's not in the movie script from 1996, so the passport details have been added later by the movie director I guess.

Bookmark and Share
posted by u2r2h at 7:48 AM 0 comments