Thursday, January 31, 2008

USA world war III -- bases in Bulgaria

NATO bases to be set up in Bulgaria

by Elitsa Savova -- Sofia Echo - 2007-01-03

US military base might be set up near the village of Chubra in the region
of Bourgas, Chubra mayor Georgi Kendov said.

The municipality was hoping that establishing the base would lead to the
modernisation of infrastructure in the region, Dnevnik daily said.

Kendov said that the money to be earned from the base could be used for a
polyclinic and daily emergency centre with ambulances.

NATO asked if the former buildings of a tank brigade in the town of Aitos
could be turned into a reserve storage base. NATO planned to store here
the equipment for one or two battalions, which would be based in the
military bases of Novo Selo and Bezmer.

The US investment in the municipalities where military bases would be set
up, would be nearly $200 million, Dnevnik said.

In late December 2007, at a public discussion, experts explained that the
bases would remain Bulgarian, under Bulgarian flag and command. The
villages near the bases would benefit from infrastructure development. The
US planned charity for the social institutions in the region of the bases,
Dnevnik said.

Sungulare mayor Georgi Kenov said that the bases were a possible way to
solve some of the problems in the municipality, including unemployment.

George Bush - US elites need war!! They care about bloodbaths only in terms of PR value. If it is negative PR they tend to avoid it. False Flag terror attacks (i.e. covert remote-controlled bombs blamed on "suicide bombers" are an international favourite amongst military and intelligence "services".

flying limbs -- severed arm of a US Soldier?

flying limbs -- severed arm of a US Soldier?

The United States should not only get out quickly, it ought to be compelled or shamed into paying huge sums to a free Iraq to compensate for the enormous damage that resulted from its commission of the "supreme crime" and murderous occupation.

Q/A on the Iraq War

Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman interviewed by Anthony DiMaggio -Nov 29, 2005

1. On Reconstruction

Anthony DiMaggio: The "humanitarian reconstruction" of Iraq has been acknowledged to a large degree as a failure in the corporate press. It's interesting, though, to see the reasons given for why: the resistance is hampering reconstruction, there wasn't perfect foresight by the Bush administration in the reconstruction coordination planning process, the excessive "rapid personnel shifts" of those Americans involved in rebuilding, American money has "necessarily" gone to "pacification" instead of rebuilding, etc. What seems to be systematically omitted here is any real responsibility placed on the Bush Administration for its failure to make humanitarian reconstruction a high priority.

Chomsky: The excuses also overlook the fact that the insurgency was created by the brutality of the invasion and occupation -- which is, in fact, one of the most astonishing failures in military history. The Nazis had less trouble in occupied Europe, and the Russians held their satellites for decades with far less difficulty. It is difficult to think of an analog. A few months after the invasion, I met a highly experienced senior physician with one of the leading relief organizations, who has served in some of the worst parts of the world. He had just returned briefly from Baghdad, where he was trying to reestablish medical facilities, but was unable to because of the incompetence of the CPA. He told me he had never seen such a combination of "arrogance, ignorance, and incompetence," referring to the Pentagon civilians in charge. In fact, it was monumental. They even failed to guard the WMD sites that had been under UN supervision, so that they were systematically looted, handing over to someone -- probably jihadis --high-precision equipment suitable for producing missiles and nuclear weapons, dangerous bio-toxins, etc., which had been provided to their friend Saddam by the US, UK and others. The ironies are almost indescribable.

Another fact overlooked, though it is finally beginning to leak, is the immense corruption under the CPA, beside which anything attributed to the UN pales in insignificance. Plenty of information has been readily available, but only tidbits were reported here.

One can go on. But the major and crucial point overlooked is the judgment of Nuremberg, declaring that aggression is "the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole." All of the "accumulated evil." Also overlooked are the stern words of the US Chief Counsel Justice Jackson: "If certain acts of violation of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us... We must never forget that the record on which we judge these defendants is the record on which history will judge us tomorrow. To pass these defendants a poisoned chalice is to put it to our own lips as well." Until at least this is recognized, all other discussion is merely footnotes, and shameful ones.

Herman: The U.S. specialty is destruction, not reconstruction, in accord with the U.S. elite's longstanding giving of primacy to military means, and the use of force in dealing with target states. We save them by destroying them, and then move on to the next creative project. This is how it works even when we succeed in bringing into power an amenable client regime, as in Nicaragua after the ouster of the Sandinistas or Afghanistan after the removal and dispersal of the Taliban. There have been explicit leadership statements to the effect that "nation-building" is not our business-we specialize in dismantlement, not construction.

In Iraq, there has been a lot of construction, but not much reconstruction. What have been constructed are massive U.S. military bases and facilities, repairs of oil extraction facilities, and protective walls in and around the Green Zone, which is essentially an occupied fortress within Baghdad. Not much has been done for Iraqi benefit. There are two incentives for reconstruction in Iraq: one is to serve U.S. companies, obviously mainly donor companies like Halliburton and Bechtel, who want the business, especially under conditions where looting is relatively easy given the difficult conditions and fiscal confusion. There is also an incentive to reconstruct in order to help sell the client government to the Iraqi people. The first incentive has been effective, with the donor companies getting lots of business with lots of overpayment, but most of their work has been in base, oil industry, and Green Zone construction, not reconstruction helpful to Iraqis. The second incentive might have had some potency except for the extreme difficulties of working in the highly insecure environment of occupied Iraq, plus the fact that Bush priorities and the unexpectedly high costs of the occupation have made this form of help to the client government too expensive; so helping the client government has been reduced to the U.S. specialty-pacification by violence.

2. On Civil War in Iraq

DiMaggio: A common argument made against de-escalation and withdrawal is that Iraq would fall into civil war. Should this argument be taken seriously by the American public? Many have argued that the U.S. is already promoting civil war in Iraq by training Iraqi security forces to fight other Iraqis (the resistance). In addition, others have pointed out that U.S. occupation is hardly going to change the dynamics of long-standing sectarian and cultural divides between Iraq's various groups (Shia, Kurds, Sunni); in fact it may make them worse by exacerbating relations between Sunni insurgents/resistance and the Shia and Kurds. Is there any legitimacy to the argument that the U.S. should prevent civil war?

Chomsky: Aggressors have no rights, only responsibility. One is to provide massive reparations (not aid). Another is to withdraw forthwith, unless there is very strong evidence that the population wants them to stay. To say that such evidence is lacking is a serious understatement. The most recent poll (August 2005), undertaken by the British Ministry of Defense and leaked to the right-wing British press, reveals that over 80% of the population want the US-UK forces out, that 1% think they increase security, and that 45% approve of attacks on US-UK forces. If this means all Iraqis, as reported, it must be that opposition to the occupiers is far higher in Arab Iraq, where they are actually deployed and engaged. This is not too surprising in the light of earlier information that has been released.

Herman: The Bush war has already started a civil war as part of the evolving occupation strategy. The character of the occupation, with its murderous use of firepower and harsh treatment of the populace, has steadily enlarged and consolidated a resistance. Having failed to get a puppet effectively installed without even nominal democratic forms, the Bush war managers opted for a tacit alliance with the Shiites and Kurds, who would be given nominal and possibly a modicum of real power via an electoral process, but with much of the legal and power arrangements of the occupation left intact and with the United States staying on to protect the new quasi-rulers from the Sunni-based insurgency. This provoked and institutionalized a civil war, with the occupation maintained as the military arm of one side. Thus the idea that the United States should stay on to avert a civil war is a laugher-it produced the resistance and then moved on to a tacit alliance with the Shiites and Kurds to fight the Sunnis on behalf of the latter two groups while trying to train and arm these to be able to pacify the Sunnis on their own, which is to say in a civil war with the foreign military's direct assistance and participation.

3. On U.S. Withdrawal

DiMaggio: Most Americans seem to be considering withdrawal within the next year or so. Do you think there is any serious role to be played by the U.N. or Arab League in ensuring a power-vacuum does not replace the American occupation, should the U.S. decide to leave? In other words, are these two organizations necessary for promoting security in Iraq? From what polling has revealed, the people of Iraq seem to prefer that Iraqi security forces should take over stabilizing and policing the country, rather than the U.S. or some other power. Is this realistic at all? Would bringing Arab League forces in not just subject Iraq to outside political pressures from neighboring regimes? And does the U.N. really have any credibility there after nearly 15 years of murderous sanctions?

Chomsky: In Western propaganda, the murderous sanctions are called "UN sanctions," which is technically accurate, but a cowardly evasion. It has always been perfectly obvious that they were initiated and conducted under US initiative, with the "spear carrier for Pax Americana" -- as Blair's Britain is described in Britain's leading journal of international affairs -- trailing politely behind. And the cruel and savage character of the sanctions (as well as the illegal oil shipments) trace right back to Washington, overwhelmingly. By April 2003, a large majority of Americans felt that the UN, not the US, should take responsibility for Iraq -- approximately the position that Spanish voters approved a year later, but in the US, democracy has deteriorated to the point that public opinion has little influence on policy, on a very wide range of issues. The discussion, in any event, is idle. It is for Iraqis to make these decisions. The invaders may have whatever uninformed subjective judgments they like, but they are of only marginal interest, no matter who the invaders are.

Herman: With a U.S. withdrawal there would be a strong incentive for the three sub-national groups to come to some kind of accommodation, without any outside assistance. The U.S. withdrawal would cut out a major part of the rationale for an insurgency, so accommodation would become possible. The very assurance of a specific and near-term U.S. timed exit would probably induce serious indigenous attempts to produce reconciliation and end a struggle that is so costly to all sides, but mostly to the Sunnis and Shiites.

Other Arab states did perform a useful mediation service in Lebanon in earlier years, so their utility in this service is not out of the question. The UN is pretty thoroughly discredited and probably has no useful role to play here. But the possibility of purely indigenous accommodation in the absence of the aggressor-occupier from abroad should not be discounted. The United States has wrecked the country and continues to do further wrecking in its pacification operations, so that ending its operations there would be a gigantic plus. It is not likely that the situation would be as bad or worse with the United States and its "coalition of the bribed" out of Iraq, and there is an excellent chance that it would be much better. The Iraqis surely ought to be given that chance of freedom from an aggression-occupation following their long years of non-freedom under Saddam Hussein.

The United States should not only get out quickly, it ought to be compelled or shamed into paying huge sums to a free Iraq to compensate for the enormous damage that resulted from its commission of the "supreme crime" and murderous occupation.

Bookmark and Share
posted by u2r2h at 7:27 PM 0 comments

Monday, January 28, 2008

Luc Courchesne - 911 ua 175 hologram video

I take it you already know that NO 767 jet ever hit the WTC.

This is proven by the LIVE TV footage, just listen to Ace Baker or watch September Clues ON THAT POINT.

If you believe that a Boeing 767 hit the tower, look again!

If you still believe hollow aluminium planes butter into buildings THEN DO NOT READ ON.

OK, so you are a noplaner.

Do you really think that the Joint Chiefs of Staff would have authorized the massaker in the USA with the threat that some idiot camera would show an explosion WITHOUT PLANE (or a missile)???

Nah, that's crazy. They could not hope to control all footage.


it is 100% logical!

Are Holograms possile?

Sure! Someone left us THE PERFECT HINT on Wikipedia!

Please read this again. Someone left us a hint:

There exist also holographic materials which don't need the developing process...

Hey, I don't blame you for your scepticism... it *IS* difficult to swallow. Hey, but that was the idea!!

WHO DID 911?
a particularly ruthless faction of fascist capitalists elites using moles in key positions throughout our national security infrastructure.

Warren Buffett at Offut is a good connection to the "fascist capitalists elites".. but to me it is certain that it was a high-tech bloodbath by the THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF, straight up, simple. A US military illusion for geopolitical hyperdrive.


Why? Because the USA had to do it .. the dollar was collapsing, finance fraud was about to blow up the system? yes! and the new military bases, Baghram-Kabul, Balad-Baghdad ... THE $$$ and the COERCION are very very very much the same thing. Don't separate the two!!


Why murder 3000 in New York? DRAMA! Shock and AWE!
Why murder people in the Pentagon?
  • remove evidence? get rid of the actual executors of the bloodbath? People that were running the hologram laser show, thinking it was a simulation
  • kill the financial comptrollers?


also see here and
here and
here and
here and
here and
here and

magic show copperfield fotomodel 911 high heels truth usa military guns


gun babe military inside job 911 gory details death us crime human


bombing disaster boeing airbus jetliner guided missile projectile


sky high dope towers demolition explsoions bush mafia junta


mouth official lord rings 911 fantasy oct cia ins conspiracy


yanky football stadium riot new york war games 911 inside job


nirvana hitler nazi terror bernaise propaganda chomsky 911 nyc

operation northwoods document template 911 snuff video mass murder

pizza fruit new york apple girl hotpants 911 atacks msnbc cbs

manager tonnage garbage septic mind artwork 911 atta general

Office of Naval Intelligence - NGO CIA NAO bush homeland security

tax superannuation benefit 911 world financial crisis graph

us map new york state canyon city diagram cheney 911

obama new york election disaster 911 trauma inside job conspiracy

anthrax warfare microbes poison human form extermination 911

astronomy space watch orbit 9-11 war machines

pipeline wars 911 geostrategy map location world war

mystery astrological sign stonehenge 9-11 truth inside job

jack in the boc fox news cbs time magazine cover girl 911 truth

murder victim nyc rape graphic smutt snuff video 911 truth

Michael Hezarkhani Carmen Taylor 911 wtc impact video photo

korean war vietnam state union action hollywood psyop media deception

cool video trick animation sequence photography fake 911 truth

automatic robot camera remote control 911 truth cia operation command

usa military army navy covert operations civil emergency fema 9111

black hole sun here I come - 911 inside job

myers air force electronic guidance transponder new york wtc 911

homing device remote control boeing 911 noplane visual vector

deep state terror richard myers hoover president bush war crimes 911

911 boeing wtc7 nypd hijacking israel shin beth mossad cia bnd

social service 911 amateur part 3 lucien courchesne video art

911 wet art secret mission explosives tesla effect electrostatic

nicola tesla superweapons psychological operation

massive destruction wide body boeing airplane frame filght

visaul flight rules boeing cessna 767 conspiracy theory

Luc Courchesne evan fairbanks footage wtc 911 ua175 impact

767 crash ny time illusion conhugate mirror laser maser

m.v. estonia - plutonium nuclear explosion space weapons bush cheney

jcs linux redhat henry shelton military brass covert operation

911 psyops covert bloodbath reichstag fire casus belli

DIA defence intelligence agency national security geospacial

space weapons geostrategy oil wars wtc 911 truth

global strategy intelligence agency divide and conquer

japanese girls in New York 911 truth US military inside job

geopolitics space domination afghanistan iraq oil war

Luc Courchesne pictures were sourced from:

11 septembre 2001
Attentats au World Trade Center

Luc Courchesne (born 1952 in St-Leonard d'Aston, Quebec, Canada) is a Canadian artist who works in the field of interactive art. Since the early eighties he has spent his time researching interactivity, and campaigning for the inclusion of multimedia exhibits in museums. He has created artworks with light, photography, film and video. In recent years he has concentrated on the representation of portraits and the coherence of mimicry, gesture and language. When creating his installations, he always takes into consideration the audience that will view the artwork.

He studied Design in Communication at the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design in Halifax (Bachelor 1974), and Visual Studies at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge (Master 1984). Since 1986, he has been a professor in industrial design at the University of Montreal. In 2005 he became director of the Ecole de design at the Universite de Montreal

Luc is credited with one of the fake videos of UA 175.For obvious reasons this video has been consigned to the Memory Hole.

In 1997 he won the Gran Pix of the ICC Bienale in Tokyo. In 1999 he was awarded a Distinction, in Interactive Art, in the Prix Ars Electronica for "Landscape One".
He currently is living and working in Montreal.

secret service bnd mossad cia inside job 911 us state terror

joint chiefs of staff military high tech weapons demonstration

hologram projector laser weapons of mass destruction fuax news

media deception 911 new york terror deep state cheney

webfairy killtown nico haupt wtc 911 thierry meyssan nyc pentagon

tina cart cia wtc video

tvfakery video fakery 911 dia oni naval intelligence

henry hugh shelton hologram 9-11 illusion false flag

frank olson cia murder wtc atrocity terrorism

new york mass murder firemen towers rescue


The person RESPONSIBLE FOR 911, Henry Hugh Shelton, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff.. *THE* person to *HAVE TO* authorize 911 ...

Think you are a perp... think you are Henry Hugh Shelton and you are not willing to be found out, you want to maximise your chances of living out a happy life with your family.

You would only really agree to such a crazy plan if you had some magic trick that the people that would hang you wouldn't readily find out about, huh?

I think this magic plan is DYNAMIC HOLOGRAPHY

I think someone from the inside left us a hint with the saturn v rocket.
Just read the paragraph where the writer talks about how Dynamic Holography is done:

There exist also holographic materials which don't need the developing process and can record a hologram in a very short time. This allows to use holography to perform some simple operations in an all-optical way. Examples of applications of such real-time holograms include phase-conjugate mirrors ("time-reversal" of light), optical cache memories, image processing (pattern recognition of time-varying images), and optical computing.
The amount of processed information can be very high (terabit/s), since the operation is performed in parallel on a whole image. This compensates the fact that the recording time, which is in the order of a microsecond, is still very long compared to the processing time of an electronic computer. The optical processing performed by a dynamic hologram is also much less flexible than electronic processing. On one side one has to perform the operation always on the whole image, and on the other side the operation a hologram can perform is basically either a multiplication or a phase conjugation. But remember that in optics, addition and Fourier transform are already easily performed in linear materials, the second simply by a lens. This enables some applications like a device that compares images in an optical way.

The search for novel nonlinear optical materials for dynamic holography is an active area of research. The most common materials are photorefractive crystals, but also in semiconductors or semiconductor heterostructures (such as quantum wells), atomic vapors and gases, plasmas and even liquids it was possible to generate holograms.

MUST READ: (this page)

Now, my theory is that the fiery-flash-upon-impact (when the "fuselage" touched the steel building) is a type of electrical discharge of the PLASMA (?) being electrically shorted to earth.

The computing needed to take care of every viewing angle is gigantic, and therefore there would be some viewing angles where the hologramm would be less perfect. They would have tried to keep the number-crunching exact for the important locations, where people would be likely to film... like battery park, and other places from below and south of the towers. The angle from chopper in the air would be less important to get perfect, because they still had life CGI-inserts at the ready.

Maybe that is the meaning behind GRADE 9 CHOPPER 5 ANYBODY ON?

I also understand that the person RESPONSIBLE FOR 911, Henry Hugh Shelton, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff.. *THE* person to *HAVE TO* authorize 911 ...
why Henry Hugh Shelton is on the board of the redhat corporation. The military uses huge clusters of linux-machines for decryption and code-breaking... they have computing power that is a state secret. This vast supercomputer can certainly do the calculations required for the life-fly-hologram.

So, physicists of all nations, please tell me.... all it needs is a conjugated mirror (PLASMA CLOUD MISSILE) that is flying into the tower and a powerful laser aboard a 747 to "illuminate" the hologramme? Or is the Laser "carrying the information" and the "missile-vapor-screen" is the passive part?

The laser that was illuminating the scene from a good many miles away was in direction of the morning sun... which would make it more difficult to spot it, against the sun.

Since the people in hoboken would see the 767-hologramm against the sun, there would be no need for detail in the image... the plane-shape needs to be correct, but otherwise it is just black.

This, BTW, is also the solution to the mystery blackness of the plane as it approaches in the other videos.... it was flying UNDER THE BLACK CLOUD ...

and the military knows a thing or two about smoke-screens, wind directions and amount of fuel needed to make a nice black cloud.

I hope you are reading all this... and I am not breaking of my nails on this shitty keyboard and are all ignoring me. In other words, please give me feedback. Even some male grunts of comprehension would be in order.

You see, the important part would be to get the plane looking believable. For the human eye light reflections are really the key to understanding shape. And for a hologramme operator to calculate the proper light reflections, well , that is the essence of her/his trade.. they do that anyway.

But still, the hologramme cannot get everything totally right. I looked at the CT, MH and Luc C images for many times now.. and I belive the 767 shows a luminance consistent with a light-emitting (!) not just light-reflecting source.

But of course that is exactly the nature of a hologramme..

OK, how about the impact shape into the tower, and the nice little explosion puffs when the ua 175 hologram enters the tower. I leave you to research that... I think, since we are dealing with the military, they have many ways of making explosions to order.

please please give me lots of feedback... hate-speech, everything. I don't mind.
Bookmark and Share
posted by u2r2h at 6:56 PM 2 comments